Disposed¶7

Rohit Sonkar v. State of U.P.

Allahabad HC11 Mar 2026BAIL/8320/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Short procedural order of the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad dated March 16, 2026 in CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 8320 of 2026, Rohit Sonkar (applicant) versus State of U.P. (opposite party); counsel: Nitesh Kumar Singh and Rabindra Tiwari for applicant, G.A. for opposite party; bench: Hon'ble Vivek Varma, J. Time of one week granted to learned AGA to complete instructions; matter to be listed as fresh on 25.3.2026. No statute or precedent cited; no holding on the bail merits; useful only as a procedural/adjournment reference.

What did the court decide?

One week's time granted to learned AGA to complete instructions; case to be placed as fresh on 25.3.2026. ¶7

Rohit Sonkar vs State of U.P. — Allahabad HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

¶2

CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 8320 of 2026

¶3

Rohit Sonkar

¶4

	Versus .....Applicant(s)
State of U.P.	.....Opposite Party(s)
Counsel for Applicant(s)	: Nitesh Kumar Singh, Rabindra Tiwari
Counsel for Opposite Party(s)	: G.A.

¶5

Court No. - 64

¶6

HON'BLE VIVEK VARMA, J.

¶7

Learned AGA prays for and is granted a week's time to complete the instructions.

¶8

Place this case as fresh on 25.3.2026.

(Vivek Varma,J.)

March 16, 2026

S.S.

Digitally signed by :- SIDDHARTH SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Rohit Sonkar v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Rohit Sonkar v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Pradeep Gautam vs State of U.P.

Harendra Yadav vs State of U.P.

Varish Khan vs State of U.P.

Mrityunjay Sharma vs State of U.P.

Musarraf vs State of U.P.

Amir vs State of U.P.