Chutku Vs State of U.P.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 8253 of 2026

Chutku		.....Applicant(s)
	Versus
State of U.P.		.....Opposite Party(s)
Counsel for Applicant(s) Counsel for Opposite Party(s)	: Ranjeet Singh : Awadhesh Kumar	Yadav, G.A.

Court No. - 70

¶4

HON'BLE HARVIR SINGH, J.

¶5

Heard learned counsel for the accused-applicant, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the material available on record.

This bail application has been moved on behalf of the accusedapplicant/ Chutku for grant of bail, in Case Crime No. 254/2025, under Section 109(1) B.N.S., Police Station Tindwari, District Banda, during pendency of trial.

Learned counsel for accused-applicant, while pressing the bail application, submits that, the accused-applicant has been falsely implicated in the instant case. It has further been submitted that general role of causing injuries to the injured has been assigned to the applicant, along with other co-accused. It has further been submitted that co-accused Babloo @ Balbeer and Ashish have already been granted bail by this Court vide orders dated 28.3.2026 and 2.4.2026 passed in Criminal Misc. Bail Application Nos. 8668 of 2026 and 3143 of 2026 respectively. Learned counsel for the applicant further submits that, the accusedapplicant is languishing in jail in this matter since 24.10.2025 having no criminal history to his discredit and there is no likelihood that, the accused-applicant after release on bail, may flee from the process of law or will misuse the liberty of bail.

Learned A.G.A. as well as learned counsel for the informant has opposed the prayer for bail of the applicant on the ground that, the injuries caused by the accused-applicant are grievous in nature, but could not confront the factual submissions made by the learned counsel for the

BAIL No. 8253 of 2026

2

accused-applicant.

Keeping in view the nature of the offence, evidence, complicity of the accused, severity of punishment, submissions of the learned counsel for the parties and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, I am of the considered view that applicant has made out a case for bail. The bail application is allowed .

Let the accused-applicant/ Chutku involved in aforesaid case be released on bail on furnishing a personal bond with two sureties in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned subject to following conditions:-