Nakul vs State of U.P.

The instant bail application has been filed with a prayer to release the applicant on bail in Case Crime No.711 of 2025, under Sections-140(1), 110, 115(2), 333 BNS, Police Station- Surajpur, District-Gautam Budh Nagar, during the pendency of the trial.

¶11

Contention of learned counsel for the applicant is that initially for the incident dated 11.12.2025, an NCR dated 11.12.2025 was lodged against the injured of the present case. Subsequently, the NCR of the applicant was converted into FIR on 17.12.2025, considering the serious injuries of the brother of co-accused Nitesh. It is further submitted that FIR dated 13.12.2025 was lodged as a counterblast by showing the date of incident as 12.12.2025, though, all injuries are simple in nature. It is further submitted that all the allegations are general in nature against the applicant as well as co-accused. It is further submitted that the applicant has no criminal history. It is lastly submitted that charge sheet has been filed in the present case, therefore, there is no requirement of custodial interrogation. The applicant is a law abiding citizen and he is languishing in jail since 21.12.2025. In case, he is granted bail, he will not misuse the liberty of bail and would cooperate in the trial proceedings.

¶12

On the other hand, learned A.G.A. for the State opposed the prayer for bail but could not dispute the aforesaid fact.

¶13

Considering the entire facts and circumstances of the case, submissions of learned counsel for the parties and keeping in view the nature of offence, evidence, complicity of accused and taking into account overcrowded jails and heavy pendency of criminal cases before the trial courts as well as considering the mandate of the judgement of the Apex Court in the case of Kapil Wadhawan vs Central Bureau of Investigation reported in 2025 SCC Online SC 3038 and without expressing any opinion on the

¶14

BAIL No. 8154 of 2026

¶15

2

¶16

merits of the case, I am of the opinion that the applicant is entitled to be enlarged on bail.

¶17

Let the applicant- Nakul involved in the aforementioned crime be released on bail, on his furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount, to the satisfaction of the court concerned, with the following conditions:-

¶18

i. The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence.

¶19

ii. The applicant shall cooperate in the trial/investigation sincerely without seeking any adjournment.

¶20

iii. The applicant shall not indulge in any criminal activity or commission of any crime after being released on bail.

¶21

iv. The applicant shall attend in accordance with the conditions of the bond executed by him.

¶22

In case of breach of any of the above conditions, it shall be a ground for cancellation of bail.

¶23

Identity, status and residence proof of the applicant and sureties be verified by the court concerned before the bonds are accepted.

¶24

It is made clear that the applicant shall be released on the basis of downloaded copy of this order from the official website of High Court Allahabad and verified by the concerned counsel with the undertaking that the certified copy will be filed within 15 days.

¶25

It is directed that the trial court shall send the release order to the concerned jail through Bail Order Management System (BOMS) to ensure early release of the applicant.

¶26

Office is directed to send a copy of this order to the applicant through concerned Jail Superintendent via e-mail or e-prison portal in compliance of the order of the Apex Court in the case of Policy Strategy for Grant of Bail, In Re: Suo Motu Writ Petition (Crl.) No. 4 of 2021 decided on 31.01.2023 reported in (2024) 10 SCC 685 .

¶27

March 18, 2026 A.Kr.

¶28

(Arun Kumar Singh Deshwal,J.)

¶29

Digitally signed by :- AJAY KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Nakul v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Nakul v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Anita Chauhan Vs State of U.P.

Shrimati Devi Vs State of U.P.

Ram Ashish Nishad vs State of U.P.

Shrimati Devi vs State of U.P.

Aamish vs State of U.P.

Anita Chauhan vs State of U.P.