Disposed¶9

Ramesh Maurya v. State of U.P.

Allahabad HC13 Mar 2026BAIL/7857/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Allahabad High Court; Court No. 69; Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 7857 of 2026; Ramesh Maurya vs State of U.P.; Justice Arun Kumar Singh Deshwal; order dated March 13, 2026; adjournment sought by Mohd. Shadab to explain criminal history of applicant; matter to be listed as fresh in week commencing 30.03.2026; no order on merits of bail; no statutes or precedents cited.

What did the court decide?

Adjournment; bail application to be listed as fresh in the week commencing 30.03.2026. ¶9

Ramesh Maurya vs State of U.P. — Allahabad HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

¶2

CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 7857 of 2026

¶3

Ramesh Maurya

¶4

.....Applicant(s)

¶5

	Versus
State of U.P.			.....Opposite Party(s)
Counsel for Applicant(s)	: Brijesh Shadab	Kumar	Srivastava, Muhd
Counsel for Opposite Party(s)	: G.A.

¶6

Court No. - 69

¶7

HON'BLE ARUN KUMAR SINGH DESHWAL, J.

¶8

Mohd. Shadab, learned counsel for the applicant seeks adjournment to explain the criminal history of the applicant.

¶9

Put up as fresh in the week commencing 30.03.2026.

¶10

(Arun Kumar Singh Deshwal,J.)

¶11

March 13, 2026

¶12

S.C.

¶13

Digitally signed by :- SHUBHAM CHAURASIA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Ramesh Maurya v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ramesh Maurya v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Musarraf vs State of U.P.

Rohit Sonkar vs State of U.P.

Mrityunjay Sharma vs State of U.P.

Amir vs State of U.P.

Jamil Ahmad vs State of U.P. and Another

Raja Sonkar and Another vs State of U.P.