Dismissed¶¶17

Kanhaiya Lal v. State of U.P.

Allahabad HC23 Apr 2026BAIL/7049/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Allahabad High Court, Harvir Singh, J.; Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 7049 of 2026, Kanhaiya Lal v. State of U.P., decided April 24, 2026. Bail application under Ss. 115(2), 118(1), 109, 351(2) BNS 2023 (Case Crime No. 232/2025, P.S. Fafoond, Distt. Auraiya) rejected on ground of grievous, dangerous-to-life head injuries to injured Abhimanyu; CT Scan and MLC referred by AGA; custody since 1.1.2026; observations limited to bail stage.

What did the court decide?

Specific allegations of causing injury on the head of the injured Abhimanyu have been levelled against the applicant, and the injuries caused to the injured are grievous in nature and dangerous to life. ¶¶17

Kanhaiya Lal Vs State of U.P. — Allahabad HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 7049 of 2026

Kanhaiya Lal

.....Applicant(s)

Versus

State of U.P.

.....Opposite Party(s)

¶7

Counsel for Applicant(s) : Ajay Singh Sengar, Vijay Singh Sengar Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : Krishna Dutt Awasthi, G.A.

¶8

Court No. - 70

¶9

HON'BLE HARVIR SINGH, J.

¶10

Heard learned counsel for the accused-applicant, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the material available on record.

¶11

This bail application has been moved on behalf of the accused-applicant/ Kanhaiya Lal, for grant of bail, in Case Crime No. 232/ 2025, under Sections 115(2), 118(1), 109 and 351(2) of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, Police Station Fafoond, District Auraiya, during pendency of trial.

¶12

Learned counsel for accused-applicant, while pressing the bail application, submits that, the accused-applicant has been falsely implicated in the instant case and has not committed any offence, as alleged by the prosecution. Learned counsel for the applicant further submits that, allegations of physical assault with the help of banka (बांका) have been levelled against the applicant. However, injuries caused to the injured- Abhimanyu (son of the informant) are simple in nature. Learned counsel for the applicant further submits that, the accused-applicant is languishing in jail in this matter, since 1.1.2026, criminal history of two cases has been explained and there is no likelihood that, the accused-applicant, after release on bail, may flee from the process of law or will misuse the liberty of bail.

¶13

Learned A.G.A. appearing on behalf of State opposes the prayer for bail of the applicant on the ground that, according to CT Scan report of injuredAbhimanyu, soft tissue injury is noted in head and according to MLC report, injury No.3 pumma incision upon nasal septa caused morbidity to life i.e. nature of injury is grievous and injuries are dangerous to life , therefore, having regard to the manner, in which the crime has been

¶14

BAIL No. 7049 of 2026

¶15

¶16

committedthe applicant is not entitled to be released on bail.

¶17

Having considered the rival contentions of the parties and having perused the record, it is evident that, specific allegations of causing injury on the head of the injured have been levelled against the applicant and injuries caused to the injured- Abhimanyu are grievous in nature and are dangerous to life . Thus, having regard to the evidence available on record against the applicant and his complicity in the crime, I do not find any good ground to release the applicant on bail. Hence, the bail application moved on behalf of applicant - Kanhaiya Lal is hereby rejected.

¶18

Observations made herein-above by this court are only for the purpose of disposal of this bail application and shall not be construed as an expression of this Court on the merits of the case.

¶19

April 24, 2026 Gurpreet Singh

¶20

(Harvir Singh,J.)

¶21

Digitally signed by :- GURPREET SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Kanhaiya Lal v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Kanhaiya Lal v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Shoaib Suleman Shaikh Vs State of U.P.

Karan Singh Vs State of U.P.

Dilip Kumar Yadav Vs State of U.P. and Another

Pankaj Kumar vs State of U.P.

Sarvesh Kumar vs State of U.P.

Karan Singh vs State of U.P.