Sunil v. State of Up and 3 Others
Case brief
What is this about?
Allahabad High Court, Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 5902 of 2024, Sunil Vs. State Of Up And 3 Others, decided March 19, 2026 by Hon'ble Sameer Jain, J. Second bail application for bail in Case Crime No.224 of 2022, Police Station Mahavan, District Mathura, under Sections 363, 366, 376 IPC and Section 5/6 of Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (POPCSO) Act. Applicant's counsel (Akash Rawat, Gaurav Sharma, Pankaj Kumar Shukla) absent even in revised call; Ram Kumar for informant and Rajiv Dhar Dwivedi, A.G.A. for State, conceded infructuousness as applicant already convicted by trial court. Bail application dismissed as infructuous. Keywords: bail, second bail application, infructuous, conviction by trial court, IPC 363/366/376, POCSO Section 5/6, Mathura, Mahavan.
What did the court decide?
The instant second bail application has become infructuous, as the applicant has already been convicted by the trial court; this is reflected both from the submission of learned counsel for the informant and from the report of the Court concerned.