Rahul Kumar Vs State of U.P. and 3 Others

The instant bail application has been filed seeking release of the applicant on bail in Case Crime No. 303 of 2025, under Sections 137(2), 87, 65(1) BNS and Section 5tha/6 POCSO Act, Police Station Chunar, District Mirzapur during pendency of the trial.

¶12

Learned counsel for the applicant submits, applicant is innocent and on the basis of false allegation he has been made accused in the present matter. He further submits, however, as per statement of victim recorded during investigation applicant has taken her in his house and kept her for three days and committed rape upon her but actually applicant and victim both were having love affair and when this fact was revealed to the informant then FIR of the present case was lodged and as informant had already lodged FIR of the present case, therefore, during investigation victim started making allegation against applicant.

¶13

He further submits, even from both the statements of victim recorded during investigation the allegation made against applicant prima facie appears to be improbable.

¶14

BAIL No. 37733 of 2025

¶15

2

¶16

He further submits, as per school record victim was about 13 years old but as per ossification test report her age is between 13-16 years. He further submits, applicant is also 19 years old, therefore, it is a case of adolescent love.

¶17

He further submits, applicant is not having any criminal history and in the present matter he is in jail since 02.07.2025 i.e. for last more than eight months.

¶18

Per contra, learned AGA opposed the prayer for bail but could not dispute the argument on facts advanced by learned counsel for the applicant.

¶19

I have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record of the case.

¶20

However, victim as per school record appears to be about 13 years old but as per ossification test report her age was between 15-16 years.

¶21

Further, victim in her statements recorded under Sections 180 and 183 BNSS however stated that applicant has kept her in his home for three days and committed rape upon her but prima facie her statements do not appear to be probable and considering this fact, the defence taken by the applicant in the instant bail application cannot be ruled out specially considering the fact that applicant also appears to be 19 years old boy.

¶22

Further, applicant is not having any criminal history and in the present matter he is in jail since 02.07.2025 i.e. for last more than eight months.

¶23

Therefore, considering the facts and circumstances of the case discussed above, in my view, applicant is entitled to be released on bail.

¶24

Accordingly, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, the instant bail application is allowed .

¶25

Let the applicant - Rahul Kumar be released on bail in the aforesaid case on furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned with the following conditions:-

¶26

(i) The applicant shall appear before the trial court on the dates fixed, unless his personal presence is exempted.

¶27

(ii) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly, make inducement, threat or

¶28

BAIL No. 37733 of 2025

¶29

3

¶30

promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or any police officer or tamper with the evidence.

¶31

(iii) The applicant shall not indulge in any criminal and anti-social activity.

¶32

In case of breach of any of the above condition, the prosecution will be at liberty to move an application before this Court for cancellation of the bail of the applicant.

¶33

It is clarified that the observations made herein are limited to the facts brought in by the parties pertaining to the disposal of bail application and the said observations shall have no bearing on the merits of the case during trial.

¶34

March 18, 2026 AK Pandey

¶35

(Sameer Jain,J.)

¶36

Digitally signed by :- ANUPAM KUMAR PANDEY High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Rahul Kumar v. State of U.P. and 3 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Rahul Kumar v. State of U.P. and 3 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Aslam Ansari vs State of U.P.

Waseem Shaikh @ Pintu vs State of U.P.

Abhimanyu Urf Annu vs State of U.P.

Amarnath Sharma Alias Babbu vs State of U.P.

Gulab Thakur vs State of U.P.

Chinta Devi vs State of U.P.