Dismissed¶13
Baddam @ Baddam Maurya v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. and 3 Others
Bail – dismissal for want of prosecution
Allahabad HCBAIL/5757/2024
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
Allahabad High Court, Lucknow Bench (Rajeev Bharti, J.), decided March 20, 2026: Baddam @ Baddam Maurya v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. and 3 others, Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 5757 of 2024 — second bail application dismissed for want of prosecution on account of non-appearance for the applicant; counsel for applicant listed as Lav Singh; G.A. for opposite parties. No substantive issues, statutes, or precedents addressed.
What did the court decide?
The second bail application is dismissed for want of prosecution, as none appeared on behalf of the applicant and no request for adjournment was made. ¶13