Allahabad HC (Lucknow Bench), Court No. 23, Rajeev Bharti J., 20-03-2026: Crl. Misc. Bail Application No. 5141 of 2024 (Shamshad v. State of U.P.) dismissed for want of prosecution; applicant and counsel absent, no adjournment sought, A.G.A. present. No statutes or cases cited; no substantive bail determination; no quantum.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW
CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 5141 of 2024
Shamshad
.....Applicant(s)
Versus
State Of U.P. Thru. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko.
.....Opposite Party(s) Counsel for Applicant(s) : Vikas Sharma, Mohd. Karim Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A.
Court No. - 23
HON'BLE RAJEEV BHARTI, J.
Case called out in the revised list.
The matter pertains to the year 2024.
None appears on behalf of the applicant nor any request for adjournment has been made.
Learned A.G.A. is present.
Accordingly, the bail application is dismissed for want of prosecution.
(Rajeev Bharti,J.)
March 20, 2026
Shukla
Digitally signed by :- ASHUTOSH KUMAR SHUKLA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
How this case reached the court
As recorded by the court registry
8 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
