Disposed¶7

Pawan Razak v. State of U.P.

Allahabad HC17 Feb 2026BAIL/42802/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Bail application adjournment order, Allahabad High Court, Court No. 64, Vivek Varma J., dated 17.03.2026. Applicant: Pawan Razak (counsel: Abhishek Kumar Jaiswal, Anuj Mishra); Opposite Party: State of U.P. (counsel: G.A.). Case adjourned at counsel's request; next date 25.03.2026 in additional cause list. No statutes, precedents, holdings or quantum involved.

What the court decided

AI extract

Pawan Razak vs State of U.P. — Allahabad HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

¶2

CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 42802 of 2025

¶3

Pawan Razak

¶4

.....Applicant(s)

¶5

	Versus
State of U.P.	.....Opposite Party(s)
Counsel for Applicant(s)	: Abhishek Kumar Jaiswal, Anuj Mishra
Counsel for Opposite Party(s)	: G.A.
Court No.- 64

¶6

HON'BLE VIVEK VARMA, J.

¶7

At the request of learned counsel for the applicant, the case is adjourned for the day.

¶8

Place this case in the additional cause list on 25.03.2026.

(Vivek Varma,J.)

March 17, 2026

Lbm/-

Digitally signed by :- LAL BAHADUR MAURYA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Pawan Razak v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What the court decided

Pawan Razak v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Dharmendra Pandey vs State of U.P.

Makhan @ Malkhan and Another vs State of U.P. and Another

Tarang Tyagi vs State of U.P. and Another

Pramod Mandal vs State of U.P.

Saurabh Kumar vs State of U.P.

Vikash Singh @ Vikash Kumar vs State of U.P.