Haseeb and Another v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. of Home Lko.
Case brief
What is this about?
Bail allowed; Criminal Misc. Bail Application 2868 of 2026; Haseeb and Naseeb v. State of U.P.; Case Crime No. 28 of 2016; P.S. Kotwali Bikapur; District Ayodhya (Faizabad); IPC sections 302, 394, 411, 201, 120-B; FIR 27.01.2016; bail on ground of parity; applicant unnamed in FIR; identity surfaced via confessional statements of co-accused (_mukbir khas_) only; no incriminating material or independent evidence; no recovery from possession or pointing out; no eyewitness account; co-accused Mohd. Shakil @ Sakilurrahman and Nasim previously granted bail (Annexure No. 7); personal bond and two sureties; conditions incl. presence for Section 313 Cr.P.C.; Manish Kumar, J.; High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench; decided 27 May 2026.
What did the court decide?
Bail application allowed; applicants Haseeb and Naseeb ordered released on bail in Case Crime No. 28 of 2016 on furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned, subject to eight conditions (cooperation with prosecution; no tampering with evidence; no pressurising/intimidating prosecution witnesses; no commission of offence; no inducement, threat or promise to dissuade disclosure or tamper with evidence; presence before the trial court on each fixed date personally or through counsel; no seeking adjournments on evidence dates when witnesses are present; personal presence for recording of statement under Section 313 Cr.P.C.). On default, the trial court may treat it as abuse of liberty of bail and pass orders in accordance with law.