Neetu v. State of U.P.

Allahabad HC21 Jan 2026BAIL/1943/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Allahabad High Court, Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 1943 of 2026, Neetu (applicant) versus State of U.P. (opposite party); single Bench of Hon'ble Santosh Rai, J.; order dated January 21, 2026; informant's vakalatnama taken on record; adjournment sought by informant's counsel; matter listed fresh on 02.02.2026; no ruling on bail merits; no statute or precedent cited.

What did the court decide?

Adjournment granted; bail application to be put up as fresh on 02.02.2026. ¶¶11

Neetu vs State of U.P. — Allahabad HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

¶2

CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 1943 of 2026

¶3

Neetu		.....Ap	plicant(s)
		Versus
State of U.P.		....	.Opposite Party(s)
Counsel for Applicant(s)	:	Arvind Kumar Srivastava, Kumar Srivastava	Shailesh
Counsel for Opposite Party(s)	:	Pankaj Kumar Singh, G.A.
Court No.- 70

¶4

HON'BLE SANTOSH RAI, J.

¶5

List and connect this bail application along with Criminal Misc. Bail Application no.1900 of 2026 as fresh.

¶6

(Santosh Rai,J.)

¶7

March 17, 2026 Asha

¶8

Digitally signed by :- ASHA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Neetu v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Neetu v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Shiv Kumar vs State of U.P. and Another

Sushil Kumar Upadhyay vs State of U.P. and 2 Others

Aman Bhartiya vs State of U.P.

Shripal vs State of U.P.

Sushil Kumar Upadhyay vs State of U.P. and 2 Others

Aman Singh vs State of U.P.