Disposed¶¶9

Viraj @ Golu v. State of U.P. and 3 Others

Allahabad HC30 Apr 2026BAIL/14626/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Bail application adjournment — AGA had no instructions — matter listed fresh on 08.05.2026 — Viraj @ Golu v. State of U.P. & 3 others — Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 14626 of 2026 — Allahabad High Court — Krishan Pahal, J. — order dated April 30, 2026 — no merits decided.

What did the court decide?

No relief on merits. At the prayer of learned AGA, who had no instructions in the matter, the application was directed to be placed as fresh on 08.05.2026. ¶¶9

Viraj @ Golu vs State of U.P. and 3 Others — Allahabad HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

¶2

CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 14626 of 2026

¶3

Viraj @ Golu

¶4

.....Applicant(s)

¶5

		Versus
State Of U.P. And 3 Others					.....Opposite Party(s)
Counsel for Applicant(s)	:	Haseeb Kumar	Alam	Ansari,	Kamalvesh
Counsel for Opposite Party(s)	:	G.A.
Court No.- 65

¶6

HON'BLE KRISHAN PAHAL, J.

¶7

As informed by learned AGA, notice to the informant has been served on 02.05.2026 only.

¶8

Learned counsel for the applicant is present.

¶9

In the interest of justice, place this application on 18.05.2026 as fresh.

¶10

(Krishan Pahal,J.)

¶11

May 8, 2026

¶12

Siddhant

¶13

Digitally signed by :- SIDDHANT SAHU High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Viraj @ Golu v. State of U.P. and 3 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Viraj @ Golu v. State of U.P. and 3 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Jitendra vs State of U.P.

Mohammad Irsad @ Nate vs State of U.P. and 3 Others

Ankit vs State of U.P. Though It Principal Secretary (Home)

Afsar vs State of U.P. and 3 Others

Chandan @ Umesh Chauhan vs State of U.P. and 3 Others

Anand Rai vs State of U.P.