Vishal Yadav Vs State of U.P.

The instant bail application has been filed with a prayer to release the applicant on bail in Case Crime No.354 of 2025, under Sections 191(2), 191(3), 103(1), 352, 61(2) B.N.S., Police Station Kerakat, District Jaunpur, during the pendency of the trial.

¶10

Contention of learned counsel for the applicant is that the applicant is an innocent person and he has been falsely implicated in the present case. He further submitted that in the CCTV footage, the applicant was not identified, even the eye-witness Akash Singh @ Saurabh Singh did not identify the applicant from CCTV footage. The applicant has been falsely implicated in the present case. The applicant has nothing to do with the present case. There is no incriminating material against the applicant. He further contended that an identically situated co-accused Amardeep Kumar, has already been granted bail by this Court in Criminal Misc. Bail Application Nos. 11518 of 2026 vide order dated 07.04.2026. Therefore, the applicant is also entitled to be released on bail on the ground of parity. He lastly submitted that charge sheet has been filed by the police, therefore, there is no requirement for custodial interrogation. The applicant has explained the criminal history and he is languishing in jail since 22.01.2026. In case, the applicant is released on bail, he will not misuse the liberty of bail and would cooperate in the trial proceedings.

¶11

Per contra, learned A.G.A. has vehemently opposed the prayer for bail but could not dispute the aforesaid facts.

¶12

Considering the entire facts and circumstances of the case, submissions of learned counsel for the parties and taking into account the fact that similarly

¶13

BAIL No. 13566 of 2026

¶14

2

¶15

situated co-accused has been enlarged on bail and keeping in view the nature of offence, evidence, complicity of the accused and taking into account overcrowded jails and heavy pendency of criminal cases before the trial courts as well as considering the mandate of the judgement of the Apex Court in the case of Kapil Wadhawan vs Central Bureau of Investigation reported in 2025 SCC OnLine SC 3038 as well as guideline of this Court in the case of Maya Tiwari Vs. State of U.P., 2024 SCC Online All 6765 regarding grant of bail and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, I am of the opinion that the applicant is entitled to be enlarged on bail. Accordingly, the present application is allowed .

¶16

Let the applicant- Vishal Yadav, involved in the aforementioned crime be released on bail, on his furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount, to the satisfaction of the court concerned, with the following conditions:-

¶17

i. The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence.

¶18

ii. The applicant shall cooperate in the trial/investigation sincerely without seeking any adjournment.

¶19

iii. The applicant shall not indulge in any criminal activity or commission of any crime after being released on bail.

¶20

iv. The applicant shall attend in accordance with the conditions of the bond executed by him.

¶21

In case of breach of any of the above conditions, it shall be a ground for cancellation of bail.

¶22

Identity, status and residence proof of the applicant and sureties be verified by the court concerned before the bonds are accepted.

¶23

Verification of mobile number and Aadhar card of the applicant as well as sureties should be verified by the court concerned.

¶24

It is made clear that the applicant shall be released on the basis of computer generated copy of this order, downloaded from the official website of High Court Allahabad and verified by the concerned counsel with the undertaking that the certified copy will be filed within 15 days.

¶25

It is further directed that the trial court shall send the release order to the

¶26

BAIL No. 13566 of 2026

¶27

3

¶28

concerned jail through Bail Order Management System (BOMS) to ensure early release of the applicant.

¶29

Office is directed to send a copy of this order to the applicant through District Jail Jaunpur via e-mail or e-prison portal within 24 hours in compliance of the order of the Apex Court in the case of Policy Strategy for Grant of Bail, In Re: Suo Motu Writ Petition (Crl.) No.4 of 2021 decided on 31.01.2023 reported in (2024) 10 SCC 685.

¶30

(Arun Kumar Singh Deshwal,J.)

¶31

April 23, 2026 SA

¶32

Digitally signed by :- SALMAN ALI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Vishal Yadav v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Vishal Yadav v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Jyoti @ Soni vs State of U.P.

Chhote Bhatiya vs State of U.P.

Manoj vs State of U.P.

Mevalal Prajapati vs State of U.P.

Shivam Namdev Vs State of U.P.

Kadeem Ahmad Vs State of U.P.