Chirag Uddin Vs State of U.P.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 12190 of 2026

Chirag Uddin	.....Applicant(s)
	Versus
State of U.P.	.....Opposite Party(s)
Counsel for Applicant(s)	: Rajnish Kumar, Sanjeev Kumar Mishra
Counsel for Opposite Party(s)	: G.A.

¶4

Court No. - 68

¶5

HON'BLE ASHUTOSH SRIVASTAVA, J.

¶6

Heard Shri Sanjeev Kumar Mishra, learned counsel for the applicant, Shri Ajay Singh, learned AGA for the State-respondents and perused the record.

¶7

This bail application under Section 483 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 has been moved on behalf of accused-applicant, Chirag Uddin , seeking enlargement on bail in Case Crime No. 375 of 2024, under Sections 331 (4), 305 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, Police Station Mirganj, District Bareilly, during the pendency of the trial before the Court below.

¶8

Learned counsel for the applicant argued that the accused-applicant is innocent. He has been falsely implicated in this very case crime number and is languishing in jail since 24.2.2026. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that FIR has been lodged against unknown person. At the time of raid conducted by the Police officials, applicant was neither arrested nor recovery was effected. Charge sheet in this case has already been filed on 3.2.2026. Further custodial interrogation of the applicant is no more required. Applicant is ready to face trial. Applicant has 11 cases of criminal antecedent, which have sufficiently been explained and there is no likelihood of his fleeing from course of justice or tampering with evidence in case of release on bail. Hence, bail has been prayed for.

¶9

Learned AGA has vehemently opposed the prayer for bail.

¶10

Considering all above facts and circumstances, the nature of accusations,

¶11

BAIL No. 12190 of 2026

¶12

2

¶13

severity of the punishment in the case of conviction and nature of supporting evidence, reasonable apprehension of tampering with the witness and prima facie, but without commenting on merit of case, a case for bail is made out.

¶14

Accordingly, the bail application is allowed .

¶15

Let the accused-applicant, Chirag Uddin , involved in above mentioned case crime number be released on bail, on his executing a personal bond and two reliable sureties each, in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned, subject to the following conditions:

¶16

The applicant will not tamper with the evidence.

¶17

The applicant will not indulge in any criminal activity.

¶18

The applicant will not pressurize/intimidate the prosecution witnesses and co-operate in the trial.

¶19

The applicant will appear regularly on each and every date fixed by the trial court, unless his personal appearance is exempted through counsel by the court concerned.

¶20

In the event of breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the court below will be at liberty to proceed to cancel his bail.

¶21

(Ashutosh Srivastava,J.)

¶22

April 20, 2026

¶23

Ravi Prakash

¶24

Digitally signed by :- RAVI PRAKASH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Chirag Uddin v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Chirag Uddin v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Richa Bhargava Vs State of U.P.

Babloo Kumar vs State of U.P.

Vijay Singh Shakya Alias Bablu Shakya Vs State of U.P.

Deeraj Kumar Upadhyay @ Deenu Vs State of U.P.

Razab Vs State of U.P.

Subhash Yadav Vs State of U.P.