Razab Vs State of U.P.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 38381 of 2025

Razab

	Versus .....Applicant(s)
State of U.P.	.....Opposite Party(s)
Counsel for Applicant(s) Counsel for Opposite Party(s)	: Mayank Yadav, Srijan Pandey : Ashutosh Dwivedi, G.A.

¶5

Court No. - 68

¶6

HON'BLE ASHUTOSH SRIVASTAVA, J.

¶7

Heard learned counsel for the applicant, Sri Ramendra Pal Singh, learned AGA for the State-Respondent and perused the record.

¶8

This bail application under Section 483 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 has been moved on behalf of the accused-applicant seeking enlargement on bail in Case Crime No. 318 of 2025, under Sections 191(2), 191(3), 190, 333, 131, 115(2), 352, 351(2), 74, 109(1) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, Police Station Singhawali Ahir, District Baghpat.

¶9

Learned counsel for the applicant argued that the accused-applicant is innocent. He has been falsely implicated in this very case crime number and is languishing in jail since 01.09.2025. He submits that in the FIR only general allegations have been levelled against all the accused who are 8 in number. He submits that no specific allegation has been levelled against the applicant. He submits that FIRs have been lodged by both the sides against each other and persons of both the sides have received injury. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that similarly circumstanced co-accused Mudassar and Muzaffi have already been enlarged on bail by the Coordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 17.04.20256 in Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 41921 of 2025. He submits that the applicant has no criminal antecedent to his credit. He further submits that there is no likelihood of his fleeing from course of justice or tampering with evidence in case of release on bail. Hence, bail has been prayed for.

¶10

Per contra learned A.G.A. has opposed the prayer for bail of the applicant,

¶11

BAIL No. 38381 of 2025

¶12

2

¶13

but could not dispute the aforesaid fact.

¶14

Considering all above facts and circumstances, the nature of accusations, severity of the punishment in the case of conviction and nature of supporting evidence, reasonable apprehension of tampering with the witness and prima facie case, but without commenting on merit of case, a case for bail is made out.

¶15

Accordingly, the bail application is allowed .

¶16

Let the accused-applicant, Razab, involved in above mentioned case crime number be released on bail, on his executing a personal bond and two reliable sureties each, in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned, subject to the following conditions:

¶17

The applicant will not tamper with the evidence.

¶18

The applicant will not indulge in any criminal activity.

¶19

The applicant will not pressurize/intimidate the prosecution witnesses and co-operate in the trial.

¶20

The applicant will appear regularly on each and every date fixed by the trial court, unless his personal appearance is exempted through counsel by the court concerned.

¶21

In the event of breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the court below will be at liberty to proceed to cancel his bail.

¶22

April 20, 2026

¶23

pks

¶24

(Ashutosh Srivastava,J.)

¶25

Digitally signed by :- PAWAN KUMAR SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Razab v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Razab v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Richa Bhargava Vs State of U.P.

Babloo Kumar vs State of U.P.

Vijay Singh Shakya Alias Bablu Shakya Vs State of U.P.

Deeraj Kumar Upadhyay @ Deenu Vs State of U.P.

Subhash Yadav Vs State of U.P.

Pushpendra Singh Vs State of U.P.