Dheeraj Sharma @ Dheeraj Kumar v. State of U.P. Thru. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko. and 3 Others
Case brief
What is this about?
Allahabad High Court, Lucknow Bench, Court No. 13, Hon'ble Manish Kumar, J., order dated May 6, 2026, in Dheeraj Sharma @ Dheeraj Kumar versus State of U.P. Thru. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko. and 3 Others, Criminal Misc Anticipatory Bail Application U/S 438 Cr.P.C. No. 268 of 2026. Purely interlocutory/administrative order: State's counter affidavit taken on record; appearance and Vakalatnama of Sri Kaushal Tiwari for the informant taken on record; three days' time granted for rejoinder affidavit; informant's counsel may file counter affidavit; case listed in the next week; no adjournment to be permitted on the next date and appropriate order to be passed in the first round itself even in the absence of the informant's counsel. Counsel: Ajay Kumar Tripathi for the applicant; G.A. for the opposite parties. No holdings, no cases cited, no amounts.
What did the court decide?
Interim procedural directions only: counter affidavit of the State taken on record; Vakalatnama of Sri Kaushal Tiwari for the informant taken on record; three days' time granted to applicant's counsel for filing rejoinder affidavit; liberty to informant's counsel to file a counter affidavit; case listed in the next week with the informant's counsel's name to be shown in the list; on the next date no adjournment to be granted on any ground and an appropriate order to be passed in the first round itself even in the absence of the informant's counsel. No merits of the anticipatory bail prayer decided.