Mohd.Shan Alias Shan Mohammad vs State of U.P Thru. Secy. Home Lko

Learned counsel for the applicant submits that he has filed the instant application seeking direction to the trial court to accept and consider a personal bond and two sureties in one criminal case and treat the same valid in all nine criminal cases in which the applicant has already been granted bail. The details of nine cases are delineated below :-

¶12

"(i) Case Crime No. 24/2019, Under Sections- 457, 380 I.P.C., P.S.Kotwali Nagar, District- Sultanpur.

¶13

(ii) Case Crime No. 525/ 2019, Under Sections- 379, 411 1.P.C., Police Station - Kotwali Nagar, District- Sultanpur.

¶14

(iii) Case Crime No. 998/2019, Under Sections- 457, 380 I.P.C., P.S.Kotwali Nagar, District- Sultanpur.

¶15

(iv) Case Crime No. 1057/2019, Under Sections- 379, 411 I.P.C., P.S.Kotwali Nagar, District- Sultanpur.

¶16

(v) Case Crime No. 1149/2019, Under Sections- 457, 380, 411 1.P.C., P.S.- Kotwali Nagar, District- Sultanpur.

¶17

A482 No. 4841 of 2026

¶18

2

¶19

(vi) Case Crime No. 1164/2019, Under Sections- 457, 380 I.P.C., P.S.Kotwali Nagar, District- Sultanpur.

¶20

(vii) Case Crime No. 58/2020, Under Sections-147,148, 149,302,307,120B,504,506 I.P.C., Police Station- Kotwali Nagar, District- Sultanpur.

¶21

(viii) Case Crime No. 100/ 2020, Under Sections- 307 I.P.C. & 3/25 Arms Act, P.S.- Kotwali Nagar, District-Sultanpur.

¶22

(ix) Case Crime No. 915/2020, Under Sections-½ (1) of U.P. Gangsters & Anti Social Activities (Prevention) Act 1986, P.S.- Kotwali Nagar, District- Sultanpur"

¶23

Learned counsel for the applicant submits that there are nine cases against the applicant and he is unable to furnish bail bonds separately in each case, as such, the concerned trial court may be directed to release the applicant on furnishing a personal bond and two sureties of the like amount in all the nine cases. He further submits that in similar circumstances, namely, in the case of Hani Nishad @ Mohammad Imran @ Vikky vs. The State of Uttar Pradesh, 2018 Supreme (SC) 2090 , the Supreme Court vide order dated 29.10.2018 has permitted the petitioner to submit a personal bond and two sureties of like amount to hold good in all the cases. He has further placed reliance on a judgment passed by this Court in Bacchi Devi vs. State of U.P., 2025 SCC Online All 5286 in aforesaid regard. Referring the aforesaid judgement and order, he submits that the applicant may also be given the benefit of the ratio of the judgement passed in Hani Nishad @ Mohammad Imran @ Vikky (supra) as well as in Bacchi Devi (supra).

¶24

Sri Ajay Kumar Srivastava, learned A.G.A. has no objection to the aforesaid request as the matter has already been settled by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the matter of Hani Nishad (supra) and by this Court in the matter of Bacchi Devi (supra) .

¶25

Considering the aforesaid facts, the concerned trial court is directed to accept a personal bond of Rs.50,000/- and two sureties of the like amount

¶26

A482 No. 4841 of 2026

¶27

3

¶28

in one case, which shall be treated to be valid in all other cases wherein the bail orders have been passed, in the light of judgments passed in Hani Nishad (supra) and Bacchi Devi (supra) . .

¶29

With the aforesaid observations and directions, the present application stands allowed .

¶30

(Praveen Kumar Giri,J.)

¶31

June 11, 2026 Manish Himwan

¶32

Digitally signed by :- MANISH HIMWAN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

Mohd.Shan Alias Shan Mohammad v. State of U.P Thru. Secy. Home Lko

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Mohd.Shan Alias Shan Mohammad v. State of U.P Thru. Secy. Home Lko

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sachin Paswan vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. of Home Lko. and 4 Others

Satish Singh vs the State of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Home Lko. and Another

Suman @ Preeti vs State of U.P. Thru. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko. and Another

Amir vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. of Home Lko. and 4 Others

Nanhe vs State of U.P. Thru. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko.

Mohd.Avid Alias Avid vs State of U.P.Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko. and Another