Allowed¶22

Ajay Kumar and 4 Others v. State of U.P. and Another

Allahabad HC2 Apr 2026A482/37430/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Allahabad High Court; Application U/S 482 No. 37430 of 2017; Ajay Kumar & 4 others v. State of U.P. & another; decided April 3, 2026 by Jai Prakash Tiwari, J.; quashing of proceedings under Sections 147, 452, 323/149, 504, 506 I.P.C. (Complaint Case No.5070 of 2016, P.S. Kotwali, District Pilibhit) arising from matrimonial discord; compromise between parties verified by court below; Section 482 Cr.P.C. inherent powers; counsel Kuldeep Johri for applicants, G.A. for opposite parties.

What did the court decide?

Application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. allowed; entire proceedings of Complaint Case No.5070 of 2016 (including summoning order dated 27.01.2017) quashed on the basis of the compromise between the parties verified by the court below. ¶22

Ajay Kumar and 4 Others Vs State of U.P. and Another — Allahabad HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

¶2

APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 37430 of 2017

¶3

Ajay Kumar And 4 Others

¶4

.....Applicant(s)

¶5

Versus

¶6

State of U.P. and Another

¶7

.....Opposite Party(s)

¶8

Counsel for Applicant(s)	: Kuldeep Johri
Counsel for Opposite Party(s)	: G.A.

¶9

Court No. - 84

¶10

HON'BLE JAI PRAKASH TIWARI, J.

¶11

Supplementary affidavit has been filed by learned counsel for the applicants today in the Court annexing the certified copy of compromise verification order. The same is taken on record.

¶12

Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned counsel for O.P. No.2 and learned AGA for the State and perused the record.

¶13

This application u/s 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed with the prayer to quash the summoning order dated 27.01.2017 as well as entire proceedings of Complaint Case No.5070 of 2016 under Sections 147, 452, 323/149, 504, 506 I.P.C. P.S. Kotwali, District Pilibhit.

¶14

Learned counsel for the applicants submits that dispute arises out of matrimonial discord between the applicant and the opposite party no. 2. The parties have reconciled their differences and a compromise has been entered between them, the same has been verified by the court below on 25.02.2026. Certified copy of the verification order is annexed along with supplementary affidavit filed today.

¶15

Learned Additional Government Advocate has submitted that since the parties have entered into compromise, which has also been verified by the concerned court, therefore, no useful purpose would be served if the proceedings of the aforesaid case go on further.

¶16

Learned counsel for the opposite party No. 2, is also present. He has no objection to the statement, made above.

¶17

In view of the above, it is deemed proper and meet the ends of justice that

¶18

A482 No. 37430 of 2017

¶19

¶20

(Jai Prakash Tiwari,J.)

¶21

the proceeding of the aforementioned case be quashed.

¶22

The present 482 Cr.P.C. application stands allowed, keeping in view the compromise made by the applicants as well as opposite party no.2, the entire proceedings of the aforesaid case, is hereby quashed.

¶23

April 3, 2026 S.K.

¶24

Digitally signed by :- SWEETY KANOJIA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Ajay Kumar and 4 Others v. State of U.P. and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ajay Kumar and 4 Others v. State of U.P. and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

X(Minor) Vs State of U.P. and Another

Amit Singh vs State of U.P.

Juvenile X Vs State of U.P. and 3 Others

Juvenile X vs State of U.P. and 3 Others

Shah Alam vs State of U.P. and Another

X Juvenile vs State of U.P. and Another