Dismissed¶¶20

Beer Bahadur Paswan and 3 Others v. State of Up and Another

Allahabad HC4 May 2026A482/3648/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Section 482 application dismissed for want of prosecution; failure to deposit mediation amount (Rs.50,000/- per judgment, Rs. 55,000/- per quoted coordinate bench order); interim order dated 15.05.2024 vacated for fraud played upon the court; applicants absent since 22.07.2024; mediation default; abuse of mediation process; Allahabad High Court; Beer Bahadur Paswan v. State of U.P.; Deepak Verma, J.

What did the court decide?

The application under Section 482 stands dismissed for want of prosecution. ¶¶20

Beer Bahadur Paswan and 3 Others Vs State of Up and Another — Allahabad HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

¶2

APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 3648 of 2024

¶3

Beer Bahadur Paswan And 3 Others

¶4

	Versus .....Applicant(s)
State of U.P. and Another	.....Opposite Party(s)
Counsel for Applicant(s)	: Ashish Kumar Pandey, Kunvar Rahul Singh
Counsel for Opposite Party(s)	: G.A., Praveen Kumar Srivastava

¶5

Court No. - 74

¶6

HON'BLE DEEPAK VERMA, J.

¶7

List revised. None appears on behalf of the applicants.

¶8

Vide order dated 15.5.2024, the matter was referred to Mediation and Conciliation Center of this Court and appellant was directed to deposit a sum of Rs.50,000/-.

¶9

As per the report dated 20.07.2024 of the Mediation Center, it has been informed that the applicants have not deposited the amount as directed in the order dated 15.05.2024. The matter was taken up on 22.07.2024, and the Coordinate Bench of this Court passed the following order:-

¶10

"1. List revised. No one is present on behalf of applicant to press this application.

¶11

2. Vakalatnama has been filed by Shri Praveen Kumar Srivastava, Advocate on behalf of opposite party no. 2 today, which is taken on record.

¶12

3. Heard Shri Praveen Kumar Srivastava, learned counsel for the opposite party no. 2 and Mhd. Soyeb Khan, learned A.G.A. for the State.

¶13

4. Vide order dated 15.05.2024 the matter was referred to the mediation centre subject to deposit of Rs. 55,000/- by the applicants before the mediation centre. However, as per the report of the Registrar mediation dated 20.07.2024 it has been informed that despite the aforesaid order the applicants have failed to deposit the aforesaid amount before the mediation centre.

¶14

5. In view thereof, it is apparent that the said reference for mediation obtained by the applicants only for the purposes of getting an interim order by playing fraud upon the court without any intent to settle the dispute through the mediation.

¶15

A482 No. 3648 of 2024

¶16

¶17

6. In view thereof, the interim order is granted on 15.05.2024 is hereby vacated.

¶18

7. Put up this matter on 01.08.2024, peremptorily.

¶19

8. It is made clear that if the applicants fail to appear on the next date, the matter shall be dismissed for want of prosecution."

¶20

Since the applicants is enjoying the interim order in the garb of resolving the dispute amicably and none has appeared on behalf of the applicants since 22.07.2024, accordingly, the present application stands dismissed for want of prosecution.

¶21

(Deepak Verma,J.)

¶22

May 5, 2026

¶23

¶24

Digitally signed by :- KAMARJAHAN ANSARI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Beer Bahadur Paswan and 3 Others v. State of Up and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Beer Bahadur Paswan and 3 Others v. State of Up and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Brij Bihari Nagayach vs State of U.P. and Another

Vipin Kumar vs State of U.P. and Another

Jittu vs State of U.P. and 3 Others

Satyam Shankhvar and Another Vs State of Up and 3 Other

Dharmendra Kumar Gupta and 3 Others vs State of U.P. and Another

Amil Vs State of U.P. and Another