Application under Section 482 CrPC to quash criminal proceedings, charge sheet and summoning order was not pressed; court permitted withdrawal with liberty to file bail application to be decided expeditiously per Satender Kumar Antil.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW
APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 3454 of 2026
Sandeep Kumar And 6 Others
.....Applicant(s)
Versus
| State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. And Another .....Opposite Party(s) |
|---|
| Counsel for Applicant(s) : Deo Raj Singh, Omkar |
| Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. |
Court No. - 16
HON'BLE SHREE PRAKASH SINGH, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the applicants and learned A.G.A. for the State as well as perused the record.
2. Instant application has been filed with prayer to quash the entire criminal proceedings of Case No.4287/2025 and quash the charge sheet dated 30.06.2024 as well as also quash the cognizance and summoning order dated 02.06.2025 passed in Case No.4287/2025 relating Case Crime No.0396/2024, under section 419, 420, 506 IPC (New Section 319(2), 318(4), 351(3) of the B.N.S. respectively), Police Station Kotwali Sadar, District - Lakhimpur Kheri.
3. Learned counsel for the applicants submits that the applicants are innocent and they have falsely been implicated in the present case with false and frivolous allegations. He further added that the applicants were not involved in committing the alleged offence as has been mentioned in the first information report.
4. At this stage, learned counsel for the applicants submits that he does not want to press the application and seeks liberty to file bail application before the learned trial court which may be decided in view of law laid by Hon'ble Supreme Court's judgment in the case of Satender Kumar Antil versus Central Bureau of Investigation and another (2022)10 SCC 51 .
5. Learned A.G.A. has no objection to the prayer made by learned counsel for the applicants.
A482 No. 3454 of 2026
2
6. On due consideration to the submissions of learned counsel for the parties, it is provided that in case, the applicants appear before the trial court within two weeks from today and file bail application, the same shall be decided expeditiously in view of law laid down in the case of Satender Kumar Antil (supra) .
7. The application is disposed off accordingly.
April 24, 2026
Mayank
(Shree Prakash Singh,J.)
Digitally signed by :- MAYANK PRATAP SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Satender Kumar Antil versus Central Bureau of Investigation and anotherApplied
(2022)10 SCC 51 · Who else cites this
3 provisions across 3 enactments
Sandeep Kumar And 6 Others
State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko.
Another
Shree Prakash Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
