Gulam Nabi Alias Gulam Navi and 7 Others vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. of Home Lko. and Another

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW

¶2

APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 3453 of 2026

¶3

Gulam Nabi Alias Gulam Navi And 7 Others

¶4

.....Applicant(s)

¶5

Versus

¶6

State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Home Lko. And Another .....Opposite Party(s) Counsel for Applicant(s) : Bhanu Pratap Singh, Naved Alam Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A.

¶7

Court No. - 16

¶8

HON'BLE SHREE PRAKASH SINGH, J.

¶9

Sri Prateek Mishra, advocate, has put in appearance by way of filing vakalatnama on behalf of opposite party no. 2 and the same is taken on record.

¶10

Heard learned counsel for the applicants, Sri Prateek Mishra, learned counsel for opposite party no. 2, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record.

¶11

The instant application has been filed with the prayer to quash the entire proceeding of Criminal of Case case crime No.4067/2025 arising out no.0044/2024, under section 498-A, 323, 506 IPC & 3/4 D.P. Act, at P.S.-Mahila Thana, District Lucknow, pending in the Civil Judge (J.D.)/F.T.C. Mahila Utpidan, Bahraich, as well as charge sheet dated 17.04.2024 along with summoning order dated 19.02.2025, issued against the applicants, on the basis of compromise dated 18.04.2026, contained as Annexure No.1 & 2 to this application, in the interest of justice.

¶12

Learned counsel appearing for the applicants submits that the applicants are innocent and have falsely been implicated in the instant case. He next added that under some misunderstanding, the instant F.I.R. has been lodged against the applicants and thereafter, the parties have amicably settled their dispute. The compromise deed has been reduced in writing on 18.04.2026 which has been annexed

¶13

A482 No. 3453 of 2026

¶14

2

¶15

as annexure no. 4 to the instant application. He next added that now there is no grievance in between the parties with each other and the criminal proceedings against the applicants are the futile exercise as there is no fate of trial and that is amount to harassment of the applicants and thus, the criminal proceedings against the applicants may be quashed.

¶16

On the other hand, learned counsel appearing for the opposite parties has supported the version of the learned counsel for the applicants and submits that the parties have settled their dispute amicably through a compromise deed and there is no further grievance of the opposite parties against the present applicants and the criminal proceedings against the applicants may be dropped.

¶17

Learned A.G.A. appearing for the State has no objection to the contentions aforesaid.

¶18

Now whether the parties have, in fact, compromised the matter or not, can best be ascertained by the trial court as such compromise has to be duly verified in presence of the parties concerned before the Court.

¶19

Accordingly, this application is disposed of with a direction to the court concerned that if any such compromise is filed before it, it shall issue notices to all the signatories to the compromise requiring their personal presence and, thereafter, proceed to verify the compromise. If the aforesaid compromise is verified, a report to that effect shall be prepared by the court and the compromise will be made part of the record.

¶20

The court in that scenario will allow the parties to obtain certified copy of the report as well as compromise and it will be open to the applicants to approach this Court again for quashing of the proceedings.

¶21

For a period of three months, the proceedings initiated in pursuance of Case case crime No.4067/2025 arising out no.0044/2024, under section 498-A, 323, 506 IPC & 3/4 D.P. Act, at P.S.-Mahila Thana, District Lucknow, pending in the Civil Judge (J.D.)/F.T.C. Mahila Utpidan, Bahraich,, shall remain stayed so far as

¶22

A482 No. 3453 of 2026

¶23

3

¶24

applicants are concerned.

¶25

The trial Court is directed to examine the fact that whether all the parties against whom the chargesheet was filed, the party in the compromise and in this respect, it shall also sent a report along with the verification order.

¶26

Office is directed to return the original compromise deed to the learned counsel for the applicants, if any, after taking the photocopy of the same.

¶27

April 24, 2026

¶28

Mayank

¶29

(Shree Prakash Singh,J.)

¶30

Digitally signed by :- MAYANK PRATAP SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

Gulam Nabi Alias Gulam Navi and 7 Others v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. of Home Lko. and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Gulam Nabi Alias Gulam Navi and 7 Others v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. of Home Lko. and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Dhruv Kumar and 2 Others vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko. and Another

Paritosh Tripathi vs State of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Home U.P. Lko.

Manoj Kumar Srivastava and Another vs State of U.P Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Govt. of U.P. and Another

Aashish and 2 Others vs State of U.P. Thru. Secy. Home Deptt. of Civil Sectt. Lko and 2 Others

Meena Devi vs State of U.P. Thru. Its Prin. Secy. Deptt. of Home Lko. and 3 Others

Sandeep Kumar and 6 Others vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. and Another