Dismissed¶¶10

Thaneshwar Prasad Dubey and Another v. State of U.P. and Another

Allahabad HC11 May 2026A482/26825/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Section 482 application; dismissal for want of prosecution; non-appearance of applicants' counsel; revised call; interim order vacated; copy of order to trial court; Allahabad High Court; Chawan Prakash, J.; 2026; Thaneshwar Prasad Dubey v. State of U.P.

What did the court decide?

The application was dismissed for want of prosecution, as no one appeared for the applicants either on the previous date or in the revised call on the hearing date. ¶¶10

Thaneshwar Prasad Dubey and Another Vs State of U.P. and Another — Allahabad HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

¶2

APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 26825 of 2021

¶3

Thaneshwar Prasad Dubey And Another

¶4

		Versus	.....Applicant(s)
State of U.P. and Another			.....Opposite Party(s)
Counsel for Applicant(s)	:	Bala Nath Mishra, Ram Sachin Mishra	Vishal Mishra,
Counsel for Opposite Party(s)	:	G.A., Mehul Khare, Saurabh Kesarwani	Rohan Gupta,

¶5

Court No. - 79

¶6

HON'BLE CHAWAN PRAKASH, J.

¶7

List revised.

¶8

None present for applicants even in revised call. However, learned counsel for opposite party No.2 and learned AGA are present.

¶9

The record shows that on the previous date, i.e., 06.04.2026 no one appeared on behalf of the applicants. Even today, none has appeared on behalf of the applicants to press the present application.

¶10