Dismissed¶10

Indrapal and 3 Others v. State of U.P. and 2 Others

Allahabad HC11 May 2026A482/24015/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Dismissal for want of prosecution (non-prosecution) of a Section 482 application before the Allahabad High Court; applicants absent on two consecutive listings (17.5.2024 and the hearing date); interim order vacated; copy of order directed to the trial court; no ruling on merits. Single judge: Chawan Prakash, J. Counsel noted: Anil Kumar Singh, Vijay Pathak, Laxmi Mahendra, Dharmendra Pratap Singh (applicants); G.A. and Pramod Kumar Sahani (opposite parties).

What did the court decide?

The application is dismissed for want of prosecution, as no one appeared for the applicants either on the previous date (17.5.2024) or on the date of hearing. ¶10

Indrapal and 3 Others Vs State of U.P. and 2 Others — Allahabad HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

¶2

APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 24015 of 2021

¶3

Indrapal And 3 Others

¶4

.....Applicant(s)

¶5

	Versus
State Of U.P. And 2 Others				.....Opposite Party(s)
Counsel for Applicant(s)	: Anil Kuma Vijay	Kumar r Singh, Laxmi	Pathak, Mahendra	Dharmendra Pratap Singh,
Counsel for Opposite Party(s)	: G.A.,	Pramod	Kumar Sah	ani

¶6

Court No. - 79

¶7

HON'BLE CHAWAN PRAKASH, J.

¶8

Case called out in the revised list. None is present on behalf of either of the parties. However, learned A.G.A. for the State is present.

¶9

The record shows that on the previous date, i.e., 17.5.2024, no one appeared on behalf of the applicants. Even today, none has appeared on behalf of the applicants to press the present application.

¶10