Amit Srivastava v. State of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Deptt. of Home Lko. and 3 Others
Case brief
What is this about?
Allahabad High Court Lucknow Bench, Application U/S 482 No. - 1921 of 2026, Amit Srivastava v. State of U.P. and others, decided 19.03.2026 by Brij Raj Singh, J. Interim/procedural order: opposite party no.3 absent as SHO Kotwali Nagar, Ayodhya did not send notice; SHO directed to secure her presence on next date only to test readiness for mediation, no harassment; listing 16.04.2026 for her statement; interim protection continued; applicant to bring demand draft of Rs.35,000/- in favour of opposite party no.3; counsel for applicant Shravan Kumar, Ajeet Kumar, Subhash; G.A. for opposite parties.
What did the court decide?
Interim order granted earlier continued in operation till the next date of listing (16.04.2026); SHO, Kotwali Nagar, Ayodhya directed to ensure presence of opposite party no.3 solely to ascertain her readiness for mediation, without harassment; AGA and Office to inform the SHO; applicant to reappear with the demand draft.