Petitioners sought a direction to the State to decide a pending case under Section 116 of the Land Revenue Code, 2006. The court, without entering into merits, directed the Sub-Divisional Magistrate, Sadar, Pratapgarh to decide the case within one year.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW
MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 704 of 2026
Malti Devi And Another
.....Petitioner(s)
Versus
State Of U.P. Thru. Secy. Deptt. Of Revenue, Lko. And 22 Others .....Respondent(s)
| Counsel for Petitioner(s) | : Hari Om Gupta, Om Prakash Gupta |
|---|---|
| Counsel for Respondent(s) | : C.S.C., Banwari Lal Maurya |
Court No. - 5
HON'BLE ALOK MATHUR, J.
A227 No. 704 of 2026
2
of certified copy of this order, in accordance with law, if there is no legal impediment.
(Alok Mathur,J.)
February 16, 2026
Ravi/
Digitally signed by :- RAVI SHANKAR SRIVASTAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
1 issue framed by the court
Whether respondent no. 2 can be directed to decide the pending case under Section 116 of the Land Revenue Code, 2006 expeditiously?
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Malti Devi
Another
State of U.P. Thru. Secy. Deptt. Of Revenue, Lko.
22 Others
Alok Mathur
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
