Disposed¶23

Sudhir Kumar Jaiswal v. Civil Judge (S.D.) Mohanlalganj Lko. and 4 Others

Allahabad HC23 Mar 2026A227/1232/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Allahabad High Court, Lucknow Bench; MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. 1232 of 2026; Sudhir Kumar Jaiswal v. Civil Judge (S.D.) Mohanlalganh & 4 Others; expeditious disposal; Order 7 Rule 11 read with Section 151 CPC; paper No. A-23; Regular Suit No. 2962/2024; time-bound schedule refused per Shaikh Uzma Feroz Hussain (SC); liberty to file expedition application; two weeks / three weeks timeline; petition disposed of; Alok Mathur, J.; 23.03.2026.

What did the court decide?

Liberty to the petitioner to move an application for expeditious disposal before the trial court within two weeks; the trial court to consider and decide that application within three weeks thereafter and pass appropriate orders if a case for expedition is made out. ¶23

Sudhir Kumar Jaiswal vs Civil Judge (S.D.)… — Writ and Judicial Review | Allahabad HC (2026)

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW

¶2

MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 1232 of 2026

Sudhir Kumar Jaiswal

.....Petitioner(s)

Versus

Civil Judge (S.D.) Mohanlalganj Lko. And 4 Others

¶7

.....Respondent(s)

¶8

Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Smt. Ruchi Gupta, Anil Kumar Gupta Counsel for Respondent(s) :

¶9

Court No. - 5

¶10

HON'BLE ALOK MATHUR, J.

¶11

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner.

¶12

In light of the proposed order, notices to private respondents are dispensed with.

¶13

Instant writ petition has been filed by the petitioner for expeditious disposal of application under Order 7 Rule 11 read with Section 151 of Civil Procedure Code, 1908 paper bearing No. A-23 connected with Civil Suit having Regular Suit No. 2962 / 2024 (Kumari Bendeshwari Jaiswaal Vs. Kumari Little aliias Meghna Raj & others).

¶14

It is urged that though the matter is being listed but for one reason or the other, the aforesaid matter is not being decided.

¶15

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that grievance of the petition would be sufficiently met in case Civil Judge (Sr. Div.), Mohanlalganj, Lucknow, considers and decides the aforesaid case in a time bound manner.

¶16

I have heard learned counsel for the petitioner and perused the record.

¶17

Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Shaikh Uzma Feroz Hussain vs The State of Maharastra passed in Writ Petition (s) (Criminal) No. 587 of 2023 has observed as under:

¶18

"We are of the view that since every High Court and every court in the country has a huge pendency, the constitutional court should avoid

¶19

A227 No. 1232 of 2026

¶20

¶21

temptation of fixing a time-bound schedule for disposal of any case before any court unless the situation is extra ordinary."

¶22

Considering the grounds raised by the petitioner and also considering the judgement of Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Shaikh Uzma Feroz Hussain (supra) liberty is given to petitioner to move an application for expeditious disposal before the trial court within next two weeks. The trial court is directed to consider and decide the same within three weeks thereafter in accordance with law and in case the trial court is of the view that a case for expediting the matter is made out, appropriate orders shall be passed thereupon.

¶23

In the light of the above, the petition is disposed of.

(Alok Mathur,J.)

March 23, 2026

Ravi/

Digitally signed by :- RAVI SHANKAR SRIVASTAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

Sudhir Kumar Jaiswal v. Civil Judge (S.D.) Mohanlalganj Lko. and 4 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sudhir Kumar Jaiswal v. Civil Judge (S.D.) Mohanlalganj Lko. and 4 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Smt. Shivratree vs Manju and 2 Others

Aruna Singh vs Tehsildar, Tehsil Tiloi, Amethi and Another

C/M Ram Narayan Shiksha Samiti Thru. Manager, Ajay Pratap Singh vs Sub Divisional Officer, Tehsil Kunda, Pratapgarh and Others

Hemant Kumar Jain vs State of U.P. Thru. the District Collector Barabanki

Manya Infra Buildwell Pvt. Ltd. Lko. Thru. Its Director Shri Anupam Prakash Pandey vs State of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief/Prin Secy. Housing and Urban Planning Development Lko. and 3 Others

Vinod Kumar Kashyap vs Smt. Piyara and 2 Others