Mohammad Ibrahim v. State of U.P. Thru. Its Prin. Secy. Deptt. of Nagar Vikas Lko. and 4 Others

Allahabad HC4 Jun 2025WTAX/538/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Amendment application in a writ petition was allowed, with liberty to carry out amendments within a week; the petition itself was ordered to be listed afresh after two weeks.

A compact analysis

This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.

Mohammad Ibrahim vs State of U.P. Thru. Its Prin. Secy. Deptt. of Nagar Vikas Lko. and 4 Others — Allahabad HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW

¶2

WRIT TAX No. - 538 of 2025

Mohammad Ibrahim

.....Petitioner(s)

Versus

State Of U.P. Thru. Its Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Nagar Vikas Lko. And 4 Others

¶7

.....Respondent(s)

¶8

Counsel for Petitioner(s)	: Prafulla	Tiwari,	Ujjwal Tripathi
Counsel for Respondent(s)	: C.S.C., Dubey	Namit	Sharma, Siddharth Shankar

¶9

Court No. - 3

¶10

HON'BLE SHEKHAR B. SARAF, J. HON'BLE SUBHASH VIDYARTHI, J.

¶11

(I.A. No.02 of 2025-Amendment Application)

¶12

Heard.

¶13

This is an application seeking amendment in the petition.

¶14

No objection has been filed against the application.

¶15

Cause shown in the affidavit filed in support of this application is sufficient.

¶16

Thus, the application is allowed .

¶17

Learned counsel for the petitioner may carryout the necessary amendments in the writ petition within a week.

¶18

(Order on petition)

¶19

List this case after two weeks as fresh.

¶20

October 31, 2025 -Amit K-

¶21

(Subhash Vidyarthi,J.) (Shekhar B. Saraf,J.)

¶22

Digitally signed by :- AMIT KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

Mohammad Ibrahim v. State of U.P. Thru. Its Prin. Secy. Deptt. of Nagar Vikas Lko. and 4 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

A compact analysis

Mohammad Ibrahim v. State of U.P. Thru. Its Prin. Secy. Deptt. of Nagar Vikas Lko. and 4 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Kanchan Prabha and Another vs Distt. Magistrate, Lko. and Another

Ajeet Pratap Singh @ Ajeet Kumar vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. P.W.D. Lko. U.P. and Others

M/S Nimbus Pipes Ltd. Thru. Authorized Signatory Sri Pravin Kumar Lath vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Namami Gange and Rural Water Supply Deptt. Lko. and 3 Others

Jai Prakash Alias Kapil Kumar vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. PWD Lko and 8 Others

The Star Health and Allied Insurance Co. Ltd. Lko. Thru. Assistant Vice President vs the Insurance Ombudsman Lko. Hazratganj Lko. and Another

Smt. Seeta Devi vs State of U.P. Thru. Its Prin. Secy. Revenue Deptt. U.P. Govt. Lko and Others