Dismissed¶18

Prabhat Kumar Agarwal v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. of Revenue Lko. and 11 Others

Allahabad HC8 Sept 2025WRIC/8452/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Allahabad High Court, Lucknow Bench; WRIT - C No. 8452 of 2025; Prabhat Kumar Agarwal v. State of U.P. thru Prin. Secy. Deptt. of Revenue Lko. and 11 others; Ayodhya land possession/ownership dispute; Gata no.362/0.1040Hec; Gata no.363Kha/0.0510Hec; Village Mauja Janaura (BNP); Pargana Haveli Awadh; Tehsil Sadar; writ of Mandamus against State interference; writ of Certiorari against SDM Ayodhya communication/order dated 07.08.2025 (Anexure no.2); based on orders dated 10.10.2023, 16.07.2024 and 10.12.2024 of Tehsildar (Judicial) Tehsil Sadar Ayodhya, ASDO Ayodhya and Civil Judge (Senior Division) Ayodhya; proclamation that petitioner not owner and illegal occupant; petition withdrawn with liberty to file afresh; dismissed as withdrawn; bench: Sangeeta Chandra J. and Brij Raj Singh J.; counsel: Shreyash Agrawal, C.S.C., Hari Om Singh; decided September 8, 2025.

What did the court decide?

Petition dismissed as withdrawn at the petitioner's counsel's request, with liberty to file a fresh petition.

o. n ers	.....Respondent(s)
Counsel for Petitioner(s) Counsel for Respondent(s)	: Shreyash Agrawal : C.S.C.

o. n ers

.....Respondent(s)

Counsel for Petitioner(s)
Counsel for Respondent(s)

:
Shreyash Agrawal
:
C.S.C.

"i. To issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus, thereby commanding the state respondents, to not interfere in the peaceful enjoyment and possession and land and house, situated at Gata no.362/0.1040Hec and Gata no.363Kha/0.0510Hec situated at Village- Mauja Janaura (BNP) Pargana- Haveli Awadh, Tehsil- Sadar, District- Ayodhya, belonging to the petitioner.

ii. To issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Certiorari, thereby, quashing the communication/order dated 07.08.2025 (Anexure no.2), issued by the Sub Divisional Magistrate, Ayodhya, wherein on the basis of orders dated 10.10.2023, 16.07.2024 and 10.12.2024 passed by

Tehsildar (Judicial), Tehsil Sadar, Ayodhya, ASDO, Ayodhya and the Ld. Civil Judge (Senior Division), Ayodhya, respectively, he has proclaimed that the petitioner is not the owner of the land situated at Gata no.362/0.1040Hec and Gata no.363Kha/0.0510Hec situated at Village- Mauja Janaura (BNP), Haveli Awadh, Tehsil- Sadar, District- Ayodhya and that he is illegally occupying the same."

Prabhat Kumar Agarwal v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. of Revenue Lko. and 11 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Prabhat Kumar Agarwal v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. of Revenue Lko. and 11 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

M/S Lucknow Printers and Publishers Thru. Partner Mr. Manish Goel Vs State of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Deptt. of Basic Education Lko. and 4 Others

Moida and Another Vs State of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Deptt. of Home Lko and 9 Others

Buddhi Lal Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Revenue Lko. and 4 Others

Girish Chandra Gupta Vs State of U.P. Thru. Secy. of Urban Development Lko. and 3 Others

Ravindra Kumar Agrahari (Ravindra Kumar Gupta) Vs the State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko. and 4 Others

Vindeshwari Prasad Pandey Vs State of U.P. Thru. Addl. Prin. Secy. Deptt. of Nagar Vikas Lko. and 11 Others