Disposed¶11

Km. Iram Naaz and Another v. State of U.P. and 3 Others

Allahabad HC4 Apr 2025WRIC/8054/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Allahabad High Court, WRIT - C No. 8054 of 2025, Km. Iram Naaz and another v. State of U.P. and 3 others, decided 23.5.2025 by Saurabh Srivastava, J. (Neutral Citation 2025:AHC:88636). Marriage / life-and-liberty protection petition disposed of; no threat material found; interim protection of 04.04.2025 discontinued; representation before SP Bijnor noted; no averment under Section 175(3) BNSS; no cases cited.

What did the court decide?

There is no material or reason to conclude that the petitioners' life and liberty are at peril; there is not even an iota of evidence that the private respondents (relatives of either petitioner) are likely to cause physical or mental assault to the petitioners. ¶8

Km. Iram Naaz and Another vs State of U.P. and 3 Others — Allahabad HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:88636

¶2

Court No. - 74

¶3

Case :- WRIT - C No. - 8054 of 2025

¶4

Petitioner :- Km. Iram Naaz And Another Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Anoj Kumar Mishra Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.

¶5

Hon'ble Saurabh Srivastava,J.

¶6

Heard learned Standing Counsel for the State-respondents. No one appeared on behalf of petitioners even in the revised call.

¶7

By way of the present writ petition, a direction in the nature of mandamus directing the respondents not to interfere in peaceful marital life of petitioners, has been sought.

¶8

Vide earlier order dated 04.04.2025, interim protection was granted by this Court in favour of petitioners for the purposes of registering their marriage and getting certificate in pursuance thereof and now there is no material or reason for this Court to conclude that the petitioners' life and liberty are at peril. There is not even an iota of evidence to evince that private respondents (relatives of either of the petitioners) are likely to cause physical or mental assault to the petitioners.

¶9

Needless to observe that petitioners have already moved a representation before the Superintendent of Police, Bijnor and in case the concerned police find any real threat perception, they will do the needful in accordance with law.

¶10

It is also observed that no specific application in shape of information preferred before the concerned police authorities for lodging any FIR against any illegal conduct carried out by the private respondents, if that be so, and no heed has ever been paid by the concerned police authorities, there is no specific averment available in the petition that any case has been instituted in pursuance to Section 175(3) of BNSS.

¶11

In view thereof, the present petition is hereby disposed of .

¶12

Interim protection granted earlier, is hereby discontinue.

¶13

Order Date :- 23.5.2025 Vivek Kr.

¶14

Digitally signed by :- VIVEK KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Km. Iram Naaz and Another v. State of U.P. and 3 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Km. Iram Naaz and Another v. State of U.P. and 3 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Sanjana Devi and Another vs State of U.P. and 4 Others

Smt. Aarti and Another vs State of U.P. and 3 Others

Ranjeet Singh vs State of U.P. and Another

Smt Sanju and Another vs State of U.P. and 3 Others

Smt. Naazreen Begum and Another Vs State of U.P. and 5 Others

Varsha Sharma and Another Vs State of Up and 3 Others