Rinki and Another v. State of U.P. and 3 Others
Case brief
What is this about?
Neutral Citation 2025:AHC:86063; WRIT - C No. 6681 of 2025; High Court of Judicature at Allahabad; Hon'ble Saurabh Srivastava, J.; Order Date 21.5.2025. Petitioners Rinki and another (Counsel: Chandra Prakash Pandey) sought a direction in the nature of mandamus restraining the State of U.P. and others (Counsel: C.S.C.) from interfering in their peaceful marital/live-in life. The Court observed that no representation had been moved before the concerned police authorities regarding any threat from the private respondents, held that no cause of action survived, and disposed of the petition. Keywords: live-in relationship, marital life, police authorities, non-interference, mandamus, cause of action, disposed.
What did the court decide?
Since the petitioners had not moved any representation before the concerned police authorities regarding any threat given to them by the private respondents due to solemnization of marriage, no cause of action survived in their favour to pursue the writ petition.