The Court dismissed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing respondents not to interfere with the petitioners marital life. The Court held that there is no serious threat perception and refused to provide security, noting the petitioners had already approached police authorities.
The writ petition was disposed of by dismissal.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:47477
Court No. - 74
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 43725 of 2024
Petitioner :- Shahin Praween And Another Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 5 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Syed Irfan Ali
Hon'ble Saurabh Srivastava,J.
and in case the concerned police finds a real threat perception, he will do the needful in accordance with law.
Order Date :- 3.4.2025 Vivek Kr.
Digitally signed by :- VIVEK KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the Court ought to issue a writ of mandamus directing respondents not to interfere with the petitioners peaceful live-in or marital life.
Whether the petitioners have established a requirement for police protection due to serious threat perception.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Lata Singh Vs. State of U.P. & Anr.Followed¶8
Lata Singh Vs. State of U.P. & Anr. (AIR 2006 SC 2522) · Who else cites this
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Shahin Praween
Shahin Praween And Another
State Of U.P.
Saurabh Srivastava
Vivek Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
2 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
