Disposed¶15

Pavan Kumar v. State of Up and 8 Others

Allahabad HC10 Dec 2025WRIC/43317/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Writ-C No. 43317 of 2025, Allahabad High Court, decided December 10, 2025; Pavan Kumar v. State of U.P. and 8 others; petition seeking mandamus for consideration of representation dated 05.05.2025 and protection of peaceful possession of Arazi No. 410 (0.0910 hectare), Village Chhidi, Tehsil and Police Station Handia, District Prayagraj; disposed of as withdrawn with liberty to pursue available remedies; bench: Atul Sreedharan and Anish Kumar Gupta, JJ.; counsel: Mahendra Kumar Pandey and Rajesh Kumar for petitioner, C.S.C. for respondents.

What did the court decide?

Petition disposed of as withdrawn with liberty to pursue such remedy as available to the petitioner under the law; no merits adjudication. ¶15

Pavan Kumar vs State of Up and 8 Others — Allahabad HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

¶2

WRIT - C No. - 43317 of 2025

¶3

Pavan Kumar

¶4

	Versus	.....Peti	tioner(s)
State Of Up And 8 Others		.....Resp	ondent(s)
Counsel for Petitioner(s)	: Mahendra Kumar Pan	Kumar, dey	Rajesh
Counsel for Respondent(s)	: C.S.C.
Court No.- 35

¶5

(SL No.69)

¶6

HON'BLE ATUL SREEDHARAN, J. HON'BLE ANISH KUMAR GUPTA, J.

¶7

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the respondents.

¶8

The instant writ petition has been filed praying for the following relief:

¶9

"(i) issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding and directing to the respondent no. 2 to consider the representation dated 05.05.2025.

¶10

(b) issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding and directing to the respondents authorities to ensure the peaceful possession of petitioner upon land of Arazi No. 410 of Area 0.0910 Hectare situated in Village Chhidi, Tehsil and Police Station Handia, DistrictPrayagraj."

¶11

Learned counsel for the petitioner wants to withdraw this petition with liberty to pursue such remedy as available to the

¶12

WRIC No. 43317 of 2025

¶13

¶14

petitioner under the law.

¶15

The petition is disposed of as withdrawn with liberty as aforementioned.

¶16

(Anish Kumar Gupta,J.) (Atul Sreedharan,J.)

¶17

December 10, 2025

¶18

Shubham Arya

¶19

Digitally signed by :- SHUBHAM ARYA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Pavan Kumar v. State of Up and 8 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Pavan Kumar v. State of Up and 8 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Dr Naresh Kumar Gupta vs State of U.P. and 2 Others

Raj Kumar Sharma vs State of U.P. and 3 Others

Ajal Krishna vs the State of U.P. and 5 Others

Dr Naresh Kumar Gupta vs State of U.P. and 2 Others

Sangeeta Devi vs State of U.P. and Another

Jishan Khan vs Union of India and 4 Others