Disposed

Ajay Kumar Singh v. State of U.P. and Another

Allahabad HC25 Nov 2025WRIC/41333/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The court disposed of the writ petition regarding non-issuance of a character certificate, permitting the petitioner to file a fresh representation to the District Magistrate within one month, to be decided in accordance with law.

What did the court decide?

Permitted to file fresh representation to District Magistrate within one month; respondent to decide within one month.

Ajay Kumar Singh vs State of U.P. and Another — Service and Employment | Allahabad HC (2025)

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

¶2

WRIT - C No. - 41333 of 2025

Ajay Kumar Singh

.....Petitioner(s)

Versus

State of U.P. and Another

¶7

.....Respondent(s)

¶8

Counsel for Petitioner(s)	: Sudeep Dwivedi
Counsel for Respondent(s)	: C.S.C.

¶9

Court No. - 40

¶10

HON'BLE SARAL SRIVASTAVA, J. HON'BLE SUDHANSHU CHAUHAN, J.

¶11

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel for State-respondents.

¶12

The grievance of the petitioner is that respondent-authority is not issuing character certificate to him despite the fact that petitioner has submitted several representations before the respondent-authority for issuance of the same.

¶13

Learned Standing Counsel submits that no useful purpose would be served in keeping the writ petition pending and appropriate direction may be issued to the respondent no.2 to consider the grievance of the petitioner.

¶14

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and without adverting into the merits of the case, we dispose off the writ petition permitting the petitioner to file a fresh representation alongwith certified copy of this order raising all his grievances before the respondent no.2-District Magistrate, Mirzapur within a period of one month from today. In case, any such representation is filed by the petitioner, the respondent no.2 shall consider and decide the same in accordance with law within a period of one month from the date he receives the representation of the petitioner in the light of judgement of this Court in the case of Anil Kumar Vs. State of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Deptt. Of Home Lko. & Others passed in Writ-C No.718 of 2025.

¶15

November 25, 2025 Sattyarth

¶16

(Sudhanshu Chauhan,J.) (Saral Srivastava,J.)

¶17

Digitally signed by :- SATTYARTH ANAND High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Ajay Kumar Singh v. State of U.P. and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ajay Kumar Singh v. State of U.P. and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

M/S Team Growth Private Limited vs State of U.P. and 4 Others

M/S R.G. Traders vs State of U.P. and 4 Others

Sushri Afroz B vs State of U.P. and 2 Others

Rahul Kumar vs State of U.P. and 2 Others

Arun Kumar Mauya and 11 Others vs State of U.P. and 6 Others

Avshan Singh Pal vs State of U.P. and 4 Others