M/S Team Growth Private Limited v. State of U.P. and 4 Others
Case brief
What is this about?
Petition challenging an order titled as notice, alleging it determined rights without due procedure or supply of ex parte reports. Court directed State to seek instructions on hearing and report supply, listing matter for further consideration.
What the court decided
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
WRIT - C No. - 41256 of 2025
M/S Team Growth Private Limited
.....Petitioner(s)
Versus
State Of U.P. And 4 Others
.....Respondent(s)
Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Birendra Singh, Swati Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C.
Court No. - 40
HON'BLE SARAL SRIVASTAVA, J. HON'BLE SUDHANSHU CHAUHAN, J.
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Rajeshwar Tripathi, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the State respondents.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that although the impugned order is titled as a notice , it is in fact an order passed by the authority determining the rights of the parties without following due procedure of law and without supplying the ex parte reports to the petitioner.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner was given a proper opportunity of hearing before the impugned order?
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
M/S Team Growth Private Limited
- respondent
State Of U.P. And 4 Others
Coram
Saral Srivastava
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · November
- Registered
- Case no.
- WRIC/41256/2025
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court