Petitioner's passport application was pending due to criminal cases against him. Court permitted him to seek a no-objection certificate from the concerned court per Pawan Kumar Rajbhar, and directed passport authorities to decide afresh within two months.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
WRIT - C No. - 41319 of 2025
Riyajuddin
.....Petitioner(s)
Versus
Union Of India And 3 Others
.....Respondent(s)
Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Surendra Mohan Mishra Counsel for Respondent(s) : A.S.G.I., C.S.C.
Court No. - 35
HON'BLE ATUL SREEDHARAN, J. HON'BLE ANISH KUMAR GUPTA, J.
November 25, 2025
Noman
(Anish Kumar Gupta,J.) (Atul Sreedharan,J.)
Digitally signed by :- NOMAN AHMAD High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
1 issue framed by the court
Whether pendency of criminal cases against the petitioner can justify withholding issuance of his passport.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Pawan Kumar Rajbhar Vs. Union of India & 2 Ors.Relied on
Writ - C No. 41540 of 2023 (Pawan Kumar Rajbhar Vs. Union of India & 2 Ors.)
5 provisions across 2 enactments
Riyajuddin
Union Of India
Respondent No. 2
Respondent No. 3
Atul Sreedharan
Anish Kumar Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
