Rambali v. State of U.P. and 4 Others
Case brief
What is this about?
Allahabad High Court; WRIT - C 41176 of 2025; decided 24 November 2025; Rambali v State of U.P.; writ petition not maintainable; Article 226 Constitution of India; complaint against private individual respondent No.5; land purchased from Scheduled Castes tenure holder on 'fraudulent facts'; sale deed Gata No.2475; unauthorized construction; respondent No.4 S.H.O. Police Station Sant Nagar District Mirzapur; bald allegations without specific averment of time and place; petitioner failed to show how aggrieved; petition dismissed; counsel Satish Kumar Mishra; counsel C.S.C.
What did the court decide?
The writ petition is not maintainable under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, because the petitioner has not been able to show how she is aggrieved and her allegations against respondent No.4 are bald, without specific averment as to time and place.