Disposed¶17

Manoj Kumar Jaiswal v. State of Uttar Pradesh and 8 Others

Allahabad HC19 Nov 2025WRIC/40494/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Writ-C No. 40494 of 2025, Allahabad High Court, disposed November 19, 2025; enforcement of Sub Divisional Magistrate's order dated 1st March, 2025 under section 11, Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act, 2007; no notice to private respondents necessary; compliance direction to respondent no. 4; Manoj Kumar Jaiswal v. State of UP.

What did the court decide?

Writ petition disposed of: petitioner to deliver certified copy of the Court's order to respondent no. 4 (Sub Divisional Magistrate) for compliance in accordance with law; respondent no. 4 to notice private respondent nos. 7 to 9 for the purpose. ¶17

Manoj Kumar Jaiswal vs State of Uttar Pradesh and 8 Others — Allahabad HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

What the court decided

AI extract

Outcome

¶17

Issue for consideration

Whether the writ petition seeking enforcement (as opposed to correctness) of the order dated 1st March, 2025 passed by respondent no. 4, the Sub Divisional Magistrate, should be disposed of with directions for compliance.

¶12

Court's answer

The Court saw no necessity to direct issuance of notice on private respondent nos. 7 to 9.

¶12

Ratio / Principle

Only the question of enforcement of the order passed by an administrative authority, as opposed to its correctness, is before the Court; the order, unless interfered with in the meantime, is to be complied with.

¶12

Key takeaways

Enforcement of the order is provided for in section 11 of the Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act, 2007, a provision the Bench examined.ratio¶13
Petitioner to communicate certified copy of the Court's order to respondent no. 4 for compliance in accordance with law, and respondent no. 4 will notice private respondent nos. 7 to 9 for the purpose.ratio¶14

Detailed headnote1 paragraphs

Allahabad High Court (Arindam Sinha and Satya Veer Singh, JJ.) disposed of Writ-C No. 40494 of 2025 (Manoj Kumar Jaiswal v. State of Uttar Pradesh and 8 others) on November 19, 2025. The petitioner sought enforcement, not review of the correctness, of the order dated 1st March, 2025 passed by respondent no. 4 (the Sub Divisional Magistrate), which afforded him relief against wrongdoing by private respondent nos. 7 to 9. The Court held there was no necessity to issue notice on private respondent nos. 7 to 9, since only the question of enforcement of an administrative order was before it and the order, unless interfered with in the meantime, was to be complied with. Enforcement was noted to be provided for in section 11 of the Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act, 2007. The petitioner was directed to communicate a certified copy of the order to respondent no. 4 for compliance in accordance with law, and respondent no. 4 was to notice private respondent nos. 7 to 9 for the purpose.

Manoj Kumar Jaiswal v. State of Uttar Pradesh and 8 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Manoj Kumar Jaiswal v. State of Uttar Pradesh and 8 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Kafeel Beg vs State of U.P. and 2 Others

Baijnath Pandey and Another vs State of U.P. and 4 Others

Satendra Gupta vs State of Uttar Pradesh and 3 Others

Samar Samrath vs Smt Sonakshi Chaudhari

Shri Balaji Enterprises vs State of U.P. and 3 Others

Vishal vs State of U.P. and 2 Others