Syed Shazi Ali v. State of U.P. and 2 Others
Case brief
What is this about?
A tenant sought directions restraining payment of land acquisition compensation to the landowner without acquisition under the 2013 Land Acquisition Act, and recovery of any compensation paid. The court doubted maintainability absent proof of lawful tenancy or the landlord's NOC and adjourned the matter.
What the court decided
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
WRIT - C No. - 40259 of 2025
Syed Shazi Ali
.....Petitioner(s)
Versus
State Of U.P. And 2 Others
.....Respondent(s)
| Counsel for Petitioner(s) Counsel for Respondent(s) |
: Manish Singh, Sushma Singh : C.S.C. |
|---|
Court No. - 29
HON'BLE MAHESH CHANDRA TRIPATHI, J. HON'BLE KUNAL RAVI SINGH, J.
- Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Shri F.A. Ansari, learned Standing Counsel for State respondents.
- The instant writ petition has been preferred for a direction to respondents not to offer or pay compensation to the land owner of the petitioner's tenancy premises without acquiring the land of the land owner after invoking the power under Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 (in short "Act, 2013") and for a further direction to respondents to recover the compensation paid, if any.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Syed Shazi Ali
- respondent
State of U.P.
- respondent
Respondent No. 2
- respondent
Respondent No. 3
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · December
- Registered
- Case no.
- WRIC/40259/2025
All orders in this case
2 orders share this CNR
- Order 1 · Mahesh Chandra Tripathi Kunal Ravi Singh
- Order 2 — this page · Mahesh Chandra Tripathi Kunal Ravi Singh
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court