Writ petition filed by petitioners against State of U.P.; counsel stated the petition had become infructuous by efflux of time. The High Court dismissed the writ petition as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:112353
Court No. - 34
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 3597 of 2025
Petitioner :- Devraj Pathak And 3 Others Respondent :- The State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Diwakar Tiwari,Sanjay Shukla Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Rohit Ranjan Agarwal,J.
Sri Diwakar Tiwari, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that writ petition has become infructuous by efflux of time.
In view of statement so made, the writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous.
Order Date :- 14.7.2025 V.S.Singh
Digitally signed by :- VIDYA SAGAR SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Devraj Pathak And 3 Others
The State Of U.P. And 3 Others
Rohit Ranjan Agarwal
As recorded by the court registry
2 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
