Dismissed¶11

Mohd. Saleem v. State of U.P. and 2 Others

Allahabad HC8 Oct 2025WRIC/34213/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Allahabad High Court, WRIT - C No. 34213 of 2025, Mohd. Saleem v. State of U.P. and 2 Others, decided October 9, 2025 by Saral Srivastava and Sudhanshu Chauhan, JJ. Writ petition dismissed as not pressed at the request of petitioner's counsel due to discrepancy in the petition, with liberty to file afresh. Procedural withdrawal order only; no merits determination, no statutory provisions or case law cited. Useful only to show non-expression of opinion on merits and availability of fresh filing.

What did the court decide?

Liberty to the petitioner to file a fresh petition. ¶11

Mohd. Saleem Vs State of U.P. and 2 Others — Allahabad HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

¶2

WRIT - C No. - 34213 of 2025

Mohd. Saleem

.....Petitioner(s)

Versus

State Of U.P. And 2 Others

¶7

	.....Re	spondent(s)
Counsel for Petitioner(s)	: Md. Muzzammil.I.Qureshi, Ali	S.M.Ayaz
Counsel for Respondent(s)	: C.S.C.

¶8

Court No. - 40

¶9

HON'BLE SARAL SRIVASTAVA, J. HON'BLE SUDHANSHU CHAUHAN, J.

¶10

There is certain discrepancy in the writ petition, therefore, learned counsel for the petitioner states that the present petition may be dismissed as not pressed with liberty to file afresh.

¶11

In such view of the fact, the writ petition is dismissed as not pressed with liberty to the petitioner to file a fresh petition.

¶12

October 9, 2025 SS

¶13

(Sudhanshu Chauhan,J.) (Saral Srivastava,J.)

¶14

Digitally signed by :- SUNIL KUMAR SHARMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Mohd. Saleem v. State of U.P. and 2 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Mohd. Saleem v. State of U.P. and 2 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases