Ramesh Singh Vs State of U.P. and 3 Others — Allahabad HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

Ramesh Singh Vs State of U.P. and 3 Others — Allahabad HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

What the court decided

AI extract

Outcome

Direction to Respondent No.2, Appellate Authority Ceiling/Additional Commissioner (Judicial), Prayagraj Division, Prayagraj, to decide Review Application No. 2122 of 2025 strictly in accordance with law, expeditiously and without granting any unnecessary adjournment; writ petition disposed of finally.

Issue for consideration

Whether the Appellate Authority Ceiling/Additional Commissioner (Judicial), Prayagraj Division, Prayagraj should be directed to decide Review Application No. 2122 of 2025 (filed in Appeal No. 47 of 1990 under Section 13 of the U.P. Imposition of Ceiling of Land Holding Act) within a stipulated period.

Court's answer

Respondent No.2, the Appellate Authority Ceiling/Additional Commissioner (Judicial), Prayagraj Division, Prayagraj, before whom Review Application No. 2122 of 2025 is pending, is directed to decide the application strictly in accordance with law, expeditiously and without granting any unnecessary adjournment.

Ratio / Principle

The present writ petition is disposed of finally in the interest of justice, the respondents having raised no objection.

Detailed headnote1 paragraphs

Allahabad High Court (Prakash Padia, J.; Court No. 6) disposed of finally a writ petition under WRIT - C No. 33587 of 2025 in which the petitioner, Ramesh Singh, sole prayer was a direction to the Appellate Authority Ceiling/Additional Commissioner (Judicial), Prayagraj Division, Prayagraj to decide Review Application No. 2122 of 2025 (State of U.P. vs. Chaturdhari (deceased) through L.R. Ramesh Singh), filed in Appeal No. 47 of 1990 (Chaturdhari vs. State of U.P.) under Section 13 of the U.P. Imposition of Ceiling of Land Holding Act, within a stipulated period. Counsel for the respondents raised no objection. The Court directed Respondent No.2, before whom the review application is pending, to decide it strictly in accordance with law, expeditiously and without granting any unnecessary adjournment. Decided September 24, 2025.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

WRIT - C No. - 33587 of 2025

Ramesh Singh

.....Petitioner(s)

Versus

State Of U.P. And 3 Others

Counsel for Petitioner(s)	: Utkarsh Singh .....Respondent(s)
Counsel for Respondent(s)	: C.S.C.

Court No. - 6

HON'BLE PRAKASH PADIA, J.

The only prayer made by the counsel for the petitioner to direct the Appellate Authority Ceiling/ Additional Commissioner (Judicial), Prayagraj Division, Prayagraj to decide the Review Application bearing no.2122 of 2025 (State of U.P. vs. Chaturdhari (deceased) through L.R. Ramesh Singh) filed in Appeal No.47 of 1990 (Chaturdhari vs. State of U.P.), u/s 13 of the U.P. Imposition of Ceiling of Land Holding Act within stipulated period.

Learned counsel appearing on behalf of Respondents has no objection.

In this view of the matter and also in the interest of justice, the present writ petition is disposed of finally, Respondent No.2 namely Appellate Authority Ceiling/ Additional Commissioner (Judicial), Prayagraj Division, Prayagraj before whom the aforesaid review application is pending is directed to decide the aforesaid application strictly in accordance with law, expeditiously and without granting any unnecessary adjournment.

(Prakash Padia,J.)

September 24, 2025

Swati

Digitally signed by :- SWATI PATHAK High Court of Judicature at Allahabad