A writ petition challenged an excise appeal order of 2006 and sought permission to deposit specified dues. The court held that with no explanation for the long delay, the petition was barred by laches and dismissed it.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:19085
Court No. - 6
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 3272 of 2025
Petitioner :- Dipendra Bahadur Singh Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Secy. Excise Deptt. Civil Sectt. Lko And 6 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Kirti Veer Singh,Ravi Shanker Singh Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Pankaj Bhatia,J.
Order Date :- 5.4.2025 Ashutosh
Digitally signed by :- ASHUTOSH PANDEY High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
1 issue framed by the court
Can a 2006 excise appellate order be challenged in a writ petition filed without explanation for the delay?
Dipendra Bahadur Singh
State Of U.P. Thru. Secy. Excise Deptt. Civil Sectt. Lko
6 Others
Pankaj Bhatia
As recorded by the court registry
2 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
