Disposed¶15

Smt. Gunjan and Another v. State of U.P. and 2 Others

Allahabad HC16 Sept 2025WRIC/32714/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

WRIT - C No. 32714 of 2025; Allahabad High Court; protection of married couple; direction not to interfere in married life; threat to life and liberty; Arya Samaj marriage at Prayagraj; verification whether Arya Samaj is a legal body; proof of majority via High School Examination 2015 marksheet (DOB 10.08.1999) and Aadhaar/PAN cards (DOB 1.3.1997); interim order; time granted to Addl. Chief Standing Counsel / C.S.C. to seek instructions; case listed 30.10.2025 as fresh; Nalin Kumar Srivastava, J.; order dated October 7, 2025.

What did the court decide?

Interim procedural directions only: 15 days' time granted to the Addl. Chief Standing Counsel to seek instructions and to verify the legal status of Arya Samaj, Prayagraj; matter to be listed on 30.10.2025 as fresh. The writ petition was not finally decided. ¶15

Smt. Gunjan and Another Vs State of U.P. and 2 Others — Allahabad HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

¶2

WRIT - C No. - 32714 of 2025

¶3

Smt. Gunjan And Another

¶4

.....Petitioner(s)

¶5

Versus

¶6

State Of U.P. And 2 Others

¶7

.....Respondent(s)

¶8

Counsel for Petitioner(s)	: Ajay Kumar Yadav
Counsel for Respondent(s)	: C.S.C.

¶9

Court No. - 78

¶10

HON'BLE NALIN KUMAR SRIVASTAVA, J.

¶11

Learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Addl. Chief Standing Counsel are present.

¶12

The petitioners have preferred this writ petition for a direction upon the respondents not to interfere in their married life and also for protection of their lives and liberty.

¶13

The petitioners claim that they are major and have performed marriage in Arya Samaj, Prayagraj and living together out of their own freewill. It is stated that for the said reason, the private respondent and his other family members have got annoyed and there is danger to the lives of the petitioners as they are being threatened and harassed. In support of their age, the petitioner no.1 has brought on record her certificate-cum-marksheet of High School Examination, 2015 wherein the date of birth of the petitioner no. 1 is shown as 10.08.1999 and at the same time petitioner no. 2 has brought on record his aadhar card and pan card to show his date of birth as 1.3.1997.

¶14

Learned Addl. Chief Standing Counsel opposed the petition and requested for grant of some time to enable him to obtain specific instructions in this regard.

¶15

On the request of Addl. Chief Standing Counsel, 15 days' time is granted to him to seek instructions in this matter. In the meanwhile, he shall also verify the fact that the Arya Samaj, Prayagraj, where the marriage between the petitioners is said to be performed, is a legal body or not.

¶16

List this case on 30.10.2025 as fresh.

¶17

October 7, 2025 ss

¶18

(Nalin Kumar Srivastava,J.)

¶19

Digitally signed by :- SANDEEP SHARMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Smt. Gunjan and Another v. State of U.P. and 2 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Smt. Gunjan and Another v. State of U.P. and 2 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases