Writ petition sought a mandamus for expeditious disposal of a restoration application pending in Section 34 U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 proceedings before the Naib Tehsildar, Mathura. The High Court, at admission stage, directed the authority to decide it after hearing all parties within one month.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
WRIT - C No. - 32202 of 2025
Vishnu Kumar
.....Petitioner(s)
Versus
State Of U.P. And 4 Others
.....Respondent(s) Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Pushpendra Kumar Mishra Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C.
Court No. - 34
HON'BLE ROHIT RANJAN AGARWAL, J.
September 16, 2025 SK Goswami
(Rohit Ranjan Agarwal,J.)
Digitally signed by :- SHIVAKANT GOSWAMI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the Naib Tehsildar should be directed to expedite the decision of a restoration application pending in proceedings under Section 34 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Vishnu Kumar
State Of U.P.
Respondents 2 to 5 (State Of U.P. And 4 Others)
Rohit Ranjan Agarwal
As recorded by the court registry
2 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
