Writ petition for police protection dismissed; no serious threat perception; petitioners cannot claim security as matter of right; representation before SP Bijnor; Section 175(3) BNSS not invoked.
None ¶¶15
No serious threat perception to petitioners; no requirement of passing any order for providing police protection. ¶¶8
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:58114
Court No. - 74
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 3188 of 2025
Petitioner :- Smt. Neha Rani And Another Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Saurabh Tripathi,Shantanu Srivastava Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Saurabh Srivastava,J.
lodging any FIR against any illegal conduct carried out by the private respondents, if that be so, and no heed has ever been paid by the concerned police authorities, there is no specific averment available in the petition that any case has been instituted in pursuance to Section 175(3) of BNSS.
Order Date :- 17.4.2025 Vivek Kr.
Digitally signed by :- VIVEK KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the petitioners face a serious threat perception warranting police protection for their peaceful marital life.¶¶8
If any person misbehaves, courts and police authorities are there to rescue, but petitioners cannot claim security as a matter of course or right without serious threat.ratio¶¶11
Whether the petitioners can claim security as a matter of right without any serious threat and without approaching police authorities under Section 175(3) BNSS.¶¶11
1 provisions across 1 enactments
How this case reached the court
Petitioners moved a representation before the Superintendent of Police, Bijnor¶¶12
As recorded by the court registry
2 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
