Abhinay Mishra v. State of U.P. and 2 Others

Allahabad HC11 Sept 2025WRIC/24435/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Allahabad High Court single-judge writ disposal (WRIT - C No. 24435 of 2025, decided 12.09.2025, Chandra Dhari Singh, J.): answer-sheet scrutiny conducted pursuant to instructions dated 10.09.2025 placed by Standing Counsel in compliance with court order dated 11.08.2025; no change found in marks obtained by petitioner Abhinay Mishra; petitioner's counsel conceded nothing left for consideration; petition disposed of in terms of the instructions. Keywords: answer-sheet scrutiny, examination marks, no change in marks, writ petition disposed, State of U.P., instructions taken on record.

What did the court decide?

The writ petition was disposed of in terms of the instructions dated 10.09.2025 placed on record by the Standing Counsel (scrutiny of the answer-sheet completed; no change found in the marks obtained by the petitioner). ¶¶15

Abhinay Mishra Vs State of U.P. and 2 Others — Allahabad HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

¶2

WRIT - C No. - 24435 of 2025

Abhinay Mishra

.....Petitioner(s)

Versus

State Of U.P. And 2 Others

¶7

.....Respondent(s)

¶8

Counsel for Petitioner(s)	: Ajay Shukla,	Lalit Singh Tomar
Counsel for Respondent(s)	: C.S.C.

¶9

Court No. - 32

¶10

HON'BLE CHANDRA DHARI SINGH, J.

¶11

In pursuance of the order dated 11.08.2025, learned Standing Counsel has received instructions and placed the same before the Court, which is taken on record.

¶12

It is submitted by learned Standing Counsel that as per instructions dated 10.09.2025, scrutiny of the answer-sheet has been done and no change has been found in the marks obtained by the petitioner.

¶13

Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that since scrutiny of the answer-sheet has already been done, nothing is left for further consideration in the present matter and the writ petition may be disposed of in terms of the instructions.

¶14

Taking into consideration of instructions and submissions of learned counsel for the petitioner, I am of the view that no purpose would be served to keep the writ petition pending.

¶15

The writ petition is disposed of in terms of the instructions.

¶16

September 12, 2025 Pratima

¶17

(Chandra Dhari Singh,J.)

¶18

Digitally signed by :- PRATIMA AGRAHARI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Abhinay Mishra v. State of U.P. and 2 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Abhinay Mishra v. State of U.P. and 2 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases