Disposed¶11

Digvijay Singh v. State of U.P. and 3 Others

Allahabad HC27 Jul 2025WRIC/19595/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Mandamus; khatauni name incorporation; gata no. 65 village Khidrpura; gata 456, 460, 531 village Chirgaon Khurd; Tehsildar Tehsil Month District Jhansi; Section 34 U.P. Revenue Code, 2006; applications dated 10.05.2022 and 17.05.2025 pending consideration; disposal at admission stage without counter affidavit; decision within two months of certified copy; no adjudication on merit; Digvijay Singh; State of U.P.; Rohit Ranjan Agarwal, J.; WRIT - C No. 19595 of 2025; 2025:AHC:123935.

What did the court decide?

Direction to respondent No. 4 (Tehsildar, Tehsil Month, District Jhansi) to decide the petitioner's applications dated 10.5.2022 and 17.5.2025 in accordance with law, preferably within a period of two months from the date of production of certified copy of the order. ¶11

Digvijay Singh Vs State of U.P. and 3 Others — Allahabad HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

What the court decided

AI extract

Outcome

¶11

Issue for consideration

Whether respondent No. 4 (Tehsildar, Tehsil Month, District Jhansi) should be directed, by way of a writ of mandamus, to incorporate the petitioner's name in the present extract of khatauni over gata no. 65 (village Khidrpura) and gata nos. 456, 460, 531 (village Chirgaon Khurd) in terms of his applications dated 10.05.2022 and 17.05.2025.

¶8

Court's answer

The writ petition is disposed of at the admission stage, without calling for counter affidavit, with a direction upon respondent No. 4 to decide the petitioner's applications dated 10.5.2022 and 17.5.2025 in accordance with law, preferably within a period of two months from the date of production of certified copy of the order.

¶10

Key takeaways

This Court has not adjudicated the case on merit; the question of incorporation of the petitioner's name in the khatauni is left to be decided by respondent No. 4.obiter¶12

Detailed headnote1 paragraphs

Allahabad High Court (Court No. 34), WRIT - C No. 19595 of 2025, decided 28.7.2025 by Rohit Ranjan Agarwal, J. (neutral citation 2025:AHC:123935). Digvijay Singh sought a mandamus directing respondent No. 4 (Tehsildar, Tehsil Month, District Jhansi) to incorporate his name in the present extract of khatauni over gata no. 65, village Khidrpura, and gata nos. 456, 460, 531, village Chirgaon Khurd, per applications dated 10.05.2022 and 17.05.2025, contending that some plot numbers had been left out in a proceeding under Section 34 of U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 and the applications were pending before respondent No. 4. The Court disposed of the writ petition at the admission stage without calling for counter affidavit, directing respondent No. 4 to decide the applications in accordance with law, preferably within two months from production of certified copy of the order, and expressly clarified that it had not adjudicated the case on merit.

Digvijay Singh v. State of U.P. and 3 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Digvijay Singh v. State of U.P. and 3 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases