Disposed¶6

Harish Solanki v. State of U.P. and 5 Others

Allahabad HC8 Jul 2025WRIC/18411/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

WRIT - C No. 18411 of 2025, High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, decided 9.7.2025 (neutral citation 2025:AHC:108614-DB). Retired Air Force petitioner denied security; impugned rejection order dated 14th April, 2025 by respondent no.4; complaint lodged and F.I.R. dated 21st November, 2024; wife of Russian origin sought security; Russian Embassy letter advised approaching police; writ court declined to assess threat perception requiring factual inquiry; petitioner directed to Regional Level Committee remedy; petition disposed of. No statutes or precedents cited.

What did the court decide?

No substantive relief; the writ petition was disposed of with the observation that petitioner must approach the Regional Level Committee regarding his grievance over the denied security. ¶6

Harish Solanki Vs State of U.P. and 5 Others — Allahabad HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

What the court decided

AI extract

Outcome

No substantive relief; the writ petition was disposed of with the observation that petitioner must approach the Regional Level Committee regarding his grievance over the denied security.

¶6

Issue for consideration

Whether petitioner, a retired Air Force personnel facing a threat particularly from the person against whom he lodged a complaint resulting in an F.I.R. dated 21st November, 2024, is entitled to be provided security notwithstanding respondent no.4's rejection of his application. +1 more

¶3

Ratio / Principle

This court declined to assess petitioner's threat perception, since assessing it would require inquiry on facts which the court was not inclined to conduct.

¶5

Key takeaways

Petitioner must avail of the available remedy by approaching the Regional Level Committee with his grievance; on that observation the writ petition was disposed of.ratio¶5

Detailed headnote1 paragraphs

High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Court No. 39 (neutral citation 2025:AHC:108614-DB), Writ - C No. 18411 of 2025, coram Arindam Sinha and Dr. Yogendra Kumar Srivastava, JJ., decided 9.7.2025. Petitioner Harish Solanki, a retired Air Force personnel facing a threat particularly from a person against whom he lodged a complaint and an F.I.R. dated 21st November, 2024 stood registered, sought provision of security; respondent no.4 rejected his application by impugned order dated 14th April, 2025. His wife, being of Russian origin, had also applied for security stating threat to his life, and the Russian Embassy letter (disclosed at page-38) advised him to approach the police. Holding that assessing threat perception would require inquiry on facts which it was not inclined to undertake, the bench disposed of the writ petition, directing petitioner to avail of the available remedy of approaching the Regional Level Committee. The State (through Dr. Devendra Kumar Tiwari, Additional Chief Standing Counsel) submitted that the Regional Level Committee was petitioner's remedy. No statutes or precedent cases were cited in the judgment.

Harish Solanki v. State of U.P. and 5 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Harish Solanki v. State of U.P. and 5 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases