Writ petition seeking mandamus to prevent interference in petitioners' live-in relationship dismissed. Court found no material evidence of threat to life, liberty, or safety necessitating police protection.
No relief granted as writ petition was dismissed for lack of merit and no threat perception.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:58168
Court No. - 74
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 1471 of 2025
Petitioner :- Smt. Damini And Another Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Mishra Vikas Kumar Prabhunath,Prashant Ji Pandey
Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Saurabh Srivastava,J.
police authorities for lodging any FIR against any illegal conduct carried out by the private respondents, if that be so, and no heed has ever been paid by the concerned police authorities, there is no specific averment available in the petition that any case has been instituted in pursuance to Section 175(3) of BNSS.
Order Date :- 16.4.2025 Rakesh
Digitally signed by :- RAKESH SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
2 issues framed by the court
Whether writ court should issue mandamus directing respondents not to interfere in peaceful live-in life of petitioners.
Whether petitioners have made out a case for police protection due to perceived threat to life and liberty.
Smt. Damini
Another
State Of U.P.
3 Others
Saurabh Srivastava
As recorded by the court registry
2 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
